Abstract 614P
Background
Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC combination with IP immunotherapy is likely to have a synergistic effect, through an increase of tumor-antigen expression and mutational load. We aimed to determine the safety of IP nivolumab after CRS and HIPEC in heavily-pretreated pts with recurrent ovarian carcinoma (NCT03959761).
Methods
In this monocentre study, pts were treated according to 3 dose-levels of IP nivolumab following a 3+3 design (0.5, 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg), starting 5 to 7 days after CRS and HIPEC, and repeated every 2 weeks for 4 infusions through an IP catheter. The primary objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of IP nivolumab based on dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at each dose-level. Secondary objectives were to assess changes over time in disease progression and changes in tolerance of CRS, HIPEC and post procedure intravenous chemotherapy.
Results
A total of 9/10 pts enrolled into the dose escalation cohort were evaluable for DLT (1 IP catheter disconnection after the 2nd IP infusion). No DLTs have been observed at either dose-level according to an independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB). Therefore, 7 pts were included into an expansion cohort with 3.0 mg/kg IP nivolumab. Overall, six pts (35.3%) did not complete all planned cycles, 4 pts due to IP catheter complications (2 painful injections, 1 disconnection, 1 infection) and 2 pts due to early tumor progression. No deaths due to treatment occurred. Nine pts (52.9%) experienced severe adverse events (SAEs), including 4 related to IP catheter. SAEs were transaminases elevation (6 pts, grade 3-4, related to CRS), hemodynamic shock (1 pt, related to CRS), hypokalemia (1 pt, related to CRS and HIPEC), portal vein thrombosis (1 pt, related to CRS). There were no SAEs related to IP nivolumab and no immune related adverse events, except 1 pt with lowering TSH levels. With a median follow-up of 10.1 months (95%CI 8.2-NA), median progression-free-survival was 7.4 months (95%CI 6.0-NA).
Conclusions
IP nivolumab was feasible and well tolerated, warranting further investigations at 3 mg/kg with other immunotherapy combinations.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03959761.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Hospices Civils de Lyon.
Funding
Hospices Civils de Lyon.
Disclosure
B. You: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, Astra-Zeneca, GSK-TESARO, BAYER, Roche-Genentech, ECS Progastrine, Novartis, LEK, Amgen, Clovis Oncology, Merck Serono, BMS, SEAGEN, Myriad. M. Lamuraglia: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: IPSEN, Jansenn, Pfizer, GSK, Merck, BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: IPSEN, Jansenn, Pfizer, GSK, Merck, BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Training: IPSEN, Jansenn, Pfizer, GSK, Merck, BMS, Astellas. J. Peron: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eisai; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eisai; Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: Fabntech; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Roche, Astra zeneca. G. Freyer: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.