Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 16

1242P - Thromboembolic events and their association with the overall survival in a large European cohort with gastroesophageal cancer

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 16

Topics

Tumour Site

Oesophageal Cancer;  Gastric Cancer;  Gastro-Oesophageal Junction Cancer

Presenters

Hannah Puhr

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S555-S580. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1065

Authors

H.C. Puhr1, M.A. Dieterle1, F. Selimi1, K. Oberreiter1, C.C. Weirauch1, L. Eischer2, S. Eichinger2, A.S.S. Berghoff1, M. Preusser1, A. Ilhan-Mutlu1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medicine I - Division Of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, 1090 - Vienna/AT
  • 2 Department Of Medicine I - Division Of Hematology And Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, 1090 - Vienna/AT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1242P

Background

Thromboembolic events are frequent complications in cancer patients, yet knowledge about their prognostic value in gastroesophageal cancer patients is scarce.

Methods

We analyzed arterial as well as venous thromboembolic events throughout patient history and associated events at the time of first cancer diagnosis with overall survival (OS) in patients with gastroesophageal cancer, who were treated at the Medical University of Vienna between 1990 and 2020. Survival analyses were performed with log-rank analyses.

Results

We analyzed 1574 patients (70% male, mean age 63 (SD 11.8)) with gastroesophageal cancer (13% stage I, 21% stage II, 30% stage III, 36% stage IV; 79% adenocarcinoma). 79% of patients were already dead at the time of this analysis. Thromboembolic events occurred in 477 (30%) patients and 135 (28%) even experienced multiple events throughout patient history. 290 (61%) occurred in the arterial, 163 (34%) in venous and 24 (5%) in both vascular systems. The table shows the thromboembolic events of this cohort. Tumor stage was neither associated with thromboembolic events throughout patient history (p=0.370) nor with venous (p=0.421) or arterial (p=0.693) thromboembolic events at first diagnosis using the Mann-Whitney-U test. Venous thromboembolic events at first cancer diagnosis were not statistically associated with a poorer OS (with event, n=32: median OS 17.9 months (95% CI 0.0-41.3), without event: median OS 20.9 (19.3-22.5), p=0.868), neither were arterial thromboembolic events at first cancer diagnosis (with event, n=48: median OS 20.7 (15.6-25.8), without event: 21.0 (19.3-22.7), p=0.070).

Conclusions

We did not find a prognostic effect of venous or arterial thromboembolic events at diagnosis of gastroesophageal cancer. Prospective studies are warranted to further explore this issue and improve patient management. Table: 1242P

Thromboembolic event Before cancer diagnosis n (%) At the time of cancer diagnosis* n (%) After cancer diagnosis n (%)
DVT**- leg 27 (2%) 10 (0.6%) 41 (3%)
Pulmonary embolism 19 (1%) 22 (1%) 64 (4%)
DVT - arm 3 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%) 14 (0.9%)
Splenic/portal vein 3 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%) 7 (0.4%)
Device associated 3 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%) 2 (0.1%)
Sinus vein 0 0 1 (0.1%)
Other venous events 4 (0.3%) 3 (0.2%) 4 (0.3%)
Myocardial infarction 117 (7%) 13 (0.8%) 28 (2%)
Peripheral artery disease 57 (4%) 16 (1%) 19 (1%)
Stroke 35 (2%) 8 (0.5%) 24 (2%)
Central artery disease 29 (2%) 10 (0.6%) 16 (1%)
Other arterial events 6 (0.4%) 1 (0.1%) 5 (0.3%)

*defined as -3 to +1 month from histological cancer diagnosis**deep vein thrombosis

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

H.C. Puhr: Other, Institutional, Other: HC.P. has received travel support from Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche and received lecture honoraria from Eli Lilly.. A.S.S. Berghoff: Other, Institutional, Other: AS.B. has received research support from Daiichi Sankyo and Roche, honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from Roche, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo as well as travel support from Roche, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo an. M. Preusser: Other, Institutional, Other: M.Pr. has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Jour. A. Ilhan-Mutlu: Other, Institutional, Other: A.I-M. participated in advisory boards from MSD, BMS and Servier, received lecture and consultation honoraria from Eli Lilly, MSD, Servier and Astellas, is the local PI for clinical trials sponsored by BMS, Roche and Amgen and received travel support from. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.