Abstract CN24
Background
The health of incarcerated individuals is worse than the general population. As a result, they are at greater risk of developing life-limiting and chronic conditions, which require palliative and potentially end-of-life care. Understanding healthcare professionals’ perceptions of challenges and practicalities around providing palliative and end-of-life care in prisons is key to advance the state of services.
Methods
Three databases were searched (CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE) from 2011 to 2021. The PRISMA reporting guideline and Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guideline informed the searches. Search terms included ‘healthcare professionals’, ‘palliative’, ‘end of life care’, and accounted for differences in terminology, e.g. ‘prisons’ (UK) and ‘correctional facilities’ (USA). Critical appraisal of methodological quality and narrative synthesis of findings were conducted.
Results
853 records were retrieved and screened. Six qualitative studies were retained, which were published between 2015 and 2021 in the UK (n=2), Australia (n=1), France (n=1) and USA (n=2). Barriers (compassionate release, the presence of prison staff, mistrust between HCPs and incarcerated individuals, the prison system and HCPs being unsure of the scope of their practice), facilitators (specialist facilities and compassionate release, training and education, and technology) and opportunities (education, development of policy and guidelines, utilising available resources and prison volunteers) for the provision of palliative and end-of-life care were found. The reviewed research was of reasonably good quality and fairly credible, with clear implications for practice.
Conclusions
Barriers to palliative and end-of-life care in prisons have yet to be resolved. Specialist and general training for healthcare professionals is recommended for future practice. Revision and implementation of policies, such as allowing for healthcare professionals time with patients without prison officers present, the process of compassionate leave being simpler, and an unlocked door policy at the end-of-life are recommended.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
Cultural determinants of end of life
Presenter: Gulcan Bagcivan
Session: Palliative and end-of-life care
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Gero-oncology integrative view on palliative care
Presenter: Wendy Oldenmenger
Session: Palliative and end-of-life care
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Navigating parental cancer when a mum or dad is at end of life
Presenter: Cherith Semple
Session: Palliative and end-of-life care
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
CN25 - Bereaved parents’ experience of adapting to life after the death of a parent with cancer who has dependent children
Presenter: Jeffrey Hanna
Session: Palliative and end-of-life care
Resources:
Abstract
CN27 - Exploring the quality of dying and death of patients with cancer undergoing palliative care (PC)
Presenter: STYLIANOS KATSARAGAKIS
Session: Palliative and end-of-life care
Resources:
Abstract
CN23 - The end of life – a topic we avoid: The Croatian National Cancer Patient Experience Survey
Presenter: Andreja Sajnic
Session: Palliative and end-of-life care
Resources:
Abstract