Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 05

1616P - The mortality burden of cachexia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 05

Presenters

Philip Bonomi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S713-S742. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1075

Authors

P.D. Bonomi1, J. Crawford2, R. Dunne3, K.E. Smoyer4, T.D. McRae5, M.I. Rossulek6, J.H. Revkin7, L.C. Tarasenko8

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Internal Medicine, Division Of Hematology, Oncology And Cell Therapy, Rush University Medical Center, 60612 - Chicago/US
  • 2 Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 27710 - Durham/US
  • 3 Department Of Medicine And Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division Of Hematology/oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 14642 - Rochester/US
  • 4 Curo, Envision Pharma Group, 19109 - Philadelphia/US
  • 5 Internal Medicine Business Unit, Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc, 10017 - New York/US
  • 6 Internal Medicine Research Unit, Worldwide Research, Development And Medical, Pfizer Inc, 02139 - Cambridge/US
  • 7 Internal Medicine Research Unit, Clinical Development, Pfizer Inc, 02139 - Cambridge/US
  • 8 Global Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, 10017 - New York/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1616P

Background

Cancer-associated cachexia is a multifactorial wasting disorder that includes anorexia, involuntary weight loss (WL) and decreased skeletal muscle mass, and is an indicator of poor prognosis. As such, international consensus (IC) diagnostic criteria for cancer cachexia have been proposed (Fearon et al., Lancet Oncol 2011;12:489–95). This systematic literature review (SLR) examined the relationship between cachexia and survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

The SLR was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Embase® and PubMed were searched to identify articles published in English between 1 Jan 2016 and 10 Oct 2021 reporting survival in adults with cancer and cachexia or at risk of cachexia, as defined by IC criteria or a broader definition of any WL. Included publications were of randomized/non-randomized clinical trials and retrospective/prospective observational studies in ≥100 patients with NSCLC.

Results

Forty-two publications in patients with NSCLC met eligibility criteria (41 observational studies; 1 pooled analysis of clinical trials). Included studies were primarily from Europe (40%), Asia (21%) or the United States (19%). Twelve studies (29%) reported cachexia using IC criteria and 30 studies reported either any WL or WL >5%. Four studies reported prevalence of cachexia, which ranged from 5.3% to 48.1%. Thirty-one studies reported prevalence of any WL; of these, 16 studies reported prevalence of WL ≥5% (prevalence range: 7.4%–58.9%). An association between survival and cachexia/WL was assessed across 41 studies that used multivariate (n=34) or univariate (n=7) analyses. Cachexia/WL was associated with a statistically significantly poorer survival in 30 of 34 studies (88.2%) that used multivariate analyses.

Conclusions

This SLR found that less than a third of studies used the IC criteria to identify cachexia in the context of NSCLC. Nonetheless, cachexia/WL was associated with significantly poorer survival in these patients. An awareness of cachexia in NSCLC would allow early implementation of disease management strategies that may improve prognosis in these patients.

Clinical trial identification

The protocol for this study is registered with the PROSPERO database: registration number CRD42022284170.

Editorial acknowledgement

Editorial support was provided by Shirley Smith, PhD, of Engage Scientific Solutions (Envision Pharma Group, Horsham, UK) and was funded by Pfizer. Assistance with database searches, reference screening, and data extraction was provided by Mohd Kashif Siddiqui, MPharm and Lauren Moubarak, MPharm, of Curo (Envision Pharma Group, Horsham, UK) and was funded by Pfizer.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The legal entity responsible for the study is Pfizer.

Funding

The study was sponsored by Pfizer.

Disclosure

P.D. Bonomi: Financial Interests, Personal, Honoraria: Pfizer, Merck, Roche Genentech. J. Crawford: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer, Actimed, Aveo, Faraday. R. Dunne: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Honoraria: Helsinn Healthcare, Exelixis. K.E. Smoyer: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Envision Pharma Group; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Envision Pharma Group. T.D. McRae: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. M.I. Rossulek: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. J.H. Revkin: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. L.C. Tarasenko: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.