Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 02

297P - The genetic profile of primary and recurrent gliomas: A mono-institutional experience using next-generation sequencing

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 02

Topics

Pathology/Molecular Biology;  Molecular Oncology

Tumour Site

Central Nervous System Malignancies

Presenters

Marta Padovan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S122-S135. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1047

Authors

M. Padovan, M. Maccari, S. Vizzaccaro, I. Cestonaro, A. Bosio, V. Zagonel, G. Lombardi

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 - Padova/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 297P

Background

The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests is currently increasing in neuro-oncology, to identify alterations of cancer-related genes and establish a better personalized glioma treatment. However, the genetic profile may change during glioma progression. Here we analyzed the difference between matched primary and recurrent gliomas by extensive NGS.

Methods

From Nov 2019 to Jan 2022, at Veneto Institute of Oncology in Padua, we collected glioma FFPE blocks at initial surgery and at recurrence. NGS was performed using FoundationOne®CDx assay.

Results

We identified 46 samples from 23 pts who underwent surgery twice. According to WHO 2021 classification, samples were classified into: 1) IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) (n=36); 2) IDH-mutant astrocytoma (n=2 Grade 2, n=5 G3 and n=1 G4); 3) IDH-mutant 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma (n=1 G2, n=1 G3). In 3 pts an evolution to higher histological grade was detected. All pts received TMZ with or without RT after the 1st surgery. NGS was successfully performed in 44/46 gliomas, while data were not reported due to sample failure in 2 cases, both among first resections. Recurrent gliomas exhibited de novo mutation in 7 pts: TP53 (4/23; 17.4%), PTEN loss (4/23; 17.4%) and NF1 alterations (6/23; 26%). Alterations such as TERT mutation (18/21), CDKN2A (14/21) CDKN2B (12/21) MTAP loss (6/21), BRCA2 (4/21) and PIK3CA mutation (2/21) were early events observed in initial samples maintained at recurrence; 2 and 4 pts have lost CDKN2A loss and EGFR mutation/amplification/fusion during progression, respectively. In one GBM, a BRCA2 germline mutation (Q2354*) was recognized; another GBM pt had a conserved BRAF V600E somatic mutation; both pts benefited from target therapy as a consequence of NGS. Median tumor mutational burden (TMB) was 1.68 (0-6.30) and 14.9 (0-129.8) mutations/megabase in initial and subsequent resection, respectively.

Conclusions

By extensive NGS, we observed 3 de novo gene alterations in 7 (30.4%) recurrent tumor patients; 6 (26%) patients showed loss of genetic alterations during progression. High TMB in second samples is consistent with reports of treatment-induced hypermutagenesis. We showed that NGS should be performed both at diagnosis and at relapse.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.