Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 11

1703P - The effect of CA4 on lung adenocarcinoma immune microenvironment

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 11

Presenters

Leen Al-Kraimeen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S772-S784. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1079

Authors

L.M. Al-Kraimeen1, O. Ababneh2, Y. Al-Kraimeen3, N. Ayoub4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Irbid, JUST - Jordan University of Science and Technology, 22110 - Irbid/JO
  • 2 Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, 22110 - Irbid/JO
  • 3 Faculty Of Medicine, Université Salah Boubnider Constantine 03, Constantine/DZ
  • 4 Faculty Of Pharmacy, JUST - Jordan University of Science and Technology, 22110 - Irbid/JO

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1703P

Background

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide and its long-term survival is less than 10%. Thus, searching for effective biomarkers to predict prognosis and screen for immunotherapy candidates is urgently needed. The present study aimed to unveil the association of CA4 with immune inhibitory components and its prognostic significance.

Methods

Gene expression profiles were retrieved from The Cancer Genomic Atlas Lung Adenocarcinoma cohort (TCGA - LAUD) (n = 567). We used the TIMER 2.0 for immune inhibitory cell infiltrates analysis and the cBioPortal tool for tumor mutational burden (TMB). Subsequently, we studied the methylation status of the gene promotor using ULCAN web. The enrichment analysis of function and signaling pathways of DEGs in LUAD was performed by gene ontology (GO) using Enrichr.

Results

CA4 is differentially expressed and downregulated in LUAD tissues compared to normal tissues (P < 0.00). High CA4 expression had favorable overall survival value (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49 – 0.90, P = 0.0025), and was negatively correlated with the infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (spearman’s ρ = -0.397, P < 0.001, ρ = -0.211, P < 0.001, respectively), but positively with macrophage M2 cells and CD8+ (ρ = 0.199, P < 0.001, ρ = 0.154, P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, survival analysis based on CA4 expression and MDSC levels revealed a better OS group identified by high CA4 expression and low MDSC levels after adjustment for age, stage, and tumor purity (P < 0.05). TMB count was inversely associated with CA4 expression (ρ = -0.12, P = 0.007). CA4 promoter methylation level was significantly hypermethylated in LUAD. GO analysis showed that genes positively co-expressed with CA4 were mainly located in specific granules, and mainly participated in biological processes of neutrophil degranulation by molecular function such as G protein-coupled receptor activity.

Conclusions

Our results imply that low expression of CA4 is an indicator of poor prognosis in LUAD patients which might be explained by the associated immune suppressive microenvironment, supporting its potential as a therapeutic target. Moreover, aberrant promoter methylation might explain CA4 downregulation by causing transcription inhibition.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.