Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 02

183P - Rates of risk-reduction mastectomy among women with inherited breast cancer

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 02

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Sonya Reid

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S55-S84. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1038

Authors

S. Reid1, M. Roberson2, J. Whisenant1, T. Shah3, L. Venton3, A. Weidner3, T. Pal3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hematology/oncology, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, 37232 - Nashville/US
  • 2 Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 37232 - Nashville/US
  • 3 Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 37232 - Nashville/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 183P

Background

Women with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in inherited breast cancer genes are more likely to develop breast cancer in their lifetime. NCCN guidelines recommend a discussion about contralateral risk reduction mastectomy (RRM) for BRCA1/2 and PALB2 carriers, however there is insufficient evidence to uniformly recommend RRM among women solely based on a P/LP variant in CHEK2 or ATM. Using the Inherited Cancer Registry (ICARE), we compared RRM rates among women with a breast cancer diagnosis and a P/LP variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2, or ATM.

Methods

Through ICARE, individuals 18+ years were asked to complete a baseline questionnaire and sign a medical record release form to obtain copies of genetic test reports and other relevant clinical records. Women with a breast cancer diagnosis and a P/LP variant in one of the five genes were identified. Relevant self-reported and clinical data were pooled for this analysis. The type of breast cancer surgery (lumpectomy vs. mastectomy vs. RRM) was compared across the five carriers using a chi-squared test.

Results

Data from 684 women with localized breast cancer and a P/LP variant (235 BRCA1, 217 BRCA2, 121 PALB2, 61 CHEK2 and 50 ATM) were included in this study (Table). Notably, rates of RRM were similar across all five genes (p=0.73). Younger women and women with a known P/LP variant prior to surgery were more likely to have RRM. Table: 183P

Characteristics of the Study Population

Total BRCA1 BRCA2 PALB2 ATM CHEK2
684 N=235 N=217 N=121 N=50 N=61
Age at Diagnosis Mean (Range) 48 (28-76) 43 (24-72) 45 (25-74) 47 (23-76) 51 (33-69) 53 (27-75) P-value
Surgery
Lumpectomy 203 30% 72 40% 60 36% 37 41% 10 32% 24 45% 0.73
Mastectomy 90 13% 33 18% 34 20% 13 14% 4 13% 6 11%
RRM 231 34% 77 42% 73 44% 41 45% 17 55% 23 43%
Relatives with Breast Cancer 0.46
None 122 18% 39 17% 32 15% 27 22% 9 18% 15 25%
First Degree 321 47% 105 45% 114 53% 52 43% 26 52% 24 39%
Second Degree 189 28% 69 29% 58 27% 35 29% 12 24% 15 25%
Third Degree 52 8% 22 9% 13 6% 7 6% 3 6% 7 11%

Conclusions

Similar rates of RRM across all carriers regardless of gene is concerning, given that RRM is not recommended solely based on CHEK2 and ATM P/LP variants in breast cancer patients. Our data suggest that known P/LP variant status at the time of surgery influenced the type of breast surgery received in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 carriers and appeared to also influence surgery in CHEK2 and ATM carriers although the cohort numbers are too small for significance. These findings warrant further evaluation to investigate possible over-treatment among women with CHEK2 and ATM P/LP variants.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.