Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 08

430P - Prediction of pathologic complete response to preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy in rectal cancer using clinical and imaging parameters

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 08

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Radiological Imaging;  Pathology/Molecular Biology;  Radiation Oncology;  Surgical Oncology

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Masoud Karimi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S136-S196. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1048

Authors

M. Karimi1, P.J. Osterlund2, K. Hammarström3, I. Imam3, J. Froedin4, B. Glimelius5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital-Solna, 171 76 - Solna/SE
  • 2 Dept. Of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital (Tays), 33521 - Tampere/FI
  • 3 Department Of Immunology, Genetics And Pathology, Uppsala University, 75185 - Uppsala/SE
  • 4 Oncology Dept, Tema Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 - Solna/SE
  • 5 Department..., Uppsala Universitet, 75185 - Uppsala/SE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 430P

Background

Complete pathological response (pCR) is achieved in 10-20% of rectal cancers when treated with preoperative short-course radiotherapy (scRT) or long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and in 28% with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) including scRT/CRT with chemotherapy. pCR is linked to better outcome. Which clinical or imaging factors predict pCR?.

Methods

All patients with preoperative treatment and delay to surgery in Uppsala-Dalarna (n=359, 2010-2018) and Stockholm (n=635, 2006-2016) were included. Data cut-off was June 1, 2019. Comparison of pCR versus non-pCR was performed with binary logistic regression models.

Results

pCR was achieved in 12% of the 994 patients: (8% [33/435] with scRT, 13% [48/358] with CRT and 21% [43/201] with TNT). In univariate analyses, age <70 (OR 2.09; CI95% 1.4-3.2), cT1-2 (2.47; 1.3-4.9), (but not cT3 1.25; 0.8-1.8) with cT4 as reference, tumour length <4cm (1.83; 1.1-2.9), CRT (1.89; 1.2-3.0), and TNT (3.31; 2.0-5.4) with scRT as reference, normal leukocytes (2.37; 1.2-4.8), thrombocytes (4.58; 1.1-19.2), and CEA (2.04; 1.3-3.3) predicted superior pCR rates, but not cN0, cMRF-, cEMVI-, level above anal verge ≥7cm, interval to surgery, or normal haemoglobin. In multivariable models (n=735), CRT (OR 2.80; 1.4-5.5), TNT (5.25; 2.6-10.4) with scRT as reference; cT1-2 (3.39; 1.1-8.7), (but not T3 1.36; 0.8-2.2) with cT4 as reference, tumour length <4cm (2.20; 142-4.0), and normal CEA (1.67; 1.0-2.8) remained significant, but not age and leucocytosis (thrombocytes not included due to 450 missing values).

Conclusions

Treatment modality (OR 4.66 for TNT and OR 2.57 for CRT) was the strongest factor for achieving pCR and cT1-2, tumour length, and normal CEA remained significant in the multivariable model. These factors are important as patients achieving pCR are candidates for organ preservation strategies.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Swedish Cancer Society, Stockholm Cancer Society.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.