Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 04

1274P - Performance status (PS) and end-of-life (EOL) care in patients (pts) with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) treated with androgen receptor targeted (ART) therapy

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 04

Topics

Clinical Research;  Supportive and Palliative Care

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

George Mellgard

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S581-S591. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1066

Authors

G. Mellgard1, Z. Chakrani1, S. McCroskery1, N. Saffran1, N. Taylor2, B. Liaw3, M.D. Galsky4, W. Oh5, C. Tsao2, V. Patel2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 10029 - New York/US
  • 2 Department Of Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 10029-5674 - New York/US
  • 3 Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 10029-5674 - New York/US
  • 4 Tisch Cancer Institute, The Mount Sinai Hospital - Icahn School of Medicine, 10029 - New York/US
  • 5 Department Of Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 10029 - New York/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1274P

Background

Preventing overtreatment is a cornerstone of palliative care that aims to reduce treatment (tx) burden especially for cancer pts. ARTs are perceived as being better tolerated and with decreased tx burden compared to traditional chemotherapies. Despite this view, there is little research supporting the use of ART or describing EOL outcomes in mPC pts with reduced PS (ECOG >= 2).

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of 165 pts with mPC who received ART between 2010 and 2021 at our institution. We assessed each record for demographic and clinical information, ART course, and survival and EOL outcomes. Our primary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) between the groups and our secondary aim was to describe EOL outcomes. Fischer’s Exact Tests were used to compare baseline characteristics. Cox regression was used to compare OS for pts with ECOG >= 2 at the start of tx with those who had an ECOG of 0 or 1. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess EOL outcomes.

Results

Median age at ART start was 70.0 years (range 42.0 – 70.0). 10.3% of pts had a ECOG >= 2 and 13.9% were post-chemo. Median OS was 8.8 months in the ECOG >= 2 group and 49.4 in the < 2 group. (HR: 4.58 [2.49 – 8.45] p-value < 0.001). Variables significant (p-value <= .2) on univariate survival analysis included charlson comorbidity index, bone metastases, radical prostatectomy, hospitalization, and ADT during tx. On multivariate survival analysis adjusted for these possible confounders, ECOG >=2 remained significantly associated with OS (HR: 1.72 [1.28 – 2.31] p-value <.001). Relevant EOL Outcomes are reported in table below. Table: 1274P

ECOG < 2 (N=57) ECOG >= 2 (N=13) Overall (N=70)
Death in Hospital
Yes 25 (43.9%) 8 (61.5%) 33 (47.1%)
Hospice Referral 30 Days Prior to Death
Yes 39 (68.4%) 6 (46.2%) 45 (64.3%)
Supportive Care Consult 30 days Prior to Death
Yes 39 (68.4%) 6 (46.2%) 45 (64.3%)

Conclusions

Pts with mPC and decreased PS experienced shorter OS compared to those with higher PS . Moreover close to a majority of pts died in the hospital with a greater percentage among those with ECOG >=2. These findings highlight the need for improved shared decision-making in ART tx and further research exploring the association between PS and EOL care.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The Authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.