Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 15

1105P - Outcomes of real-world (RW) patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC) and high programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression receiving first line (1L) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 15

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Melinda Hsu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S448-S554. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1064

Authors

M.L. Hsu1, W. Ge2, N. Wu2, R. Quek2, J. Liu3, J.J. Jalbert2, P. Rietschel4, J. Feliciano5, J. Harnett2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Hematology-oncology, University Hospitals, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, 44106 - Cleveland/US
  • 2 Clinical Sciences, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 10591 - Tarrytown/US
  • 3 Oncology, Genesis Research, 07030 - Hoboken/US
  • 4 Clinical Sciences, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown/US
  • 5 Department Of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 21287 - Baltimore/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1105P

Background

ICIs are the standard of care for aNSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50%, with trials reporting median survival of ≥20 months. Here, we describe outcomes in RW pts initiating 1L ICIs including a subgroup meeting key ICI pivotal trial eligibility criteria.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study using the Flatiron Health nationwide de-identified electronic health record-derived aNSCLC database (2018/01/01–2021/07/31) was conducted. Pts initiating 1L ICI ± chemo with PD-L1 ≥50% without ALK/EGFR/ROS1 alterations and a “trial-like” subgroup with ECOG 0–1, adequate organ function, and no brain metastases/other cancers were identified. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between ICI regimen and OS stratified by PD-L1 level in the overall cohort, adjusting for demographic and baseline clinical factors.

Results

A total of 2631 pts with aNSCLC initiating ICI + chemo (n=992) or ICI monotherapy (mono; n=1639) were included; median (Q1–Q3) age was 71 (63–78) years and 51.6% were male; 1029 were trial-like. The trial-like pts generally had better outcomes vs the overall cohort; those receiving ICI + chemo had longer median OS vs ICI mono (Table). In multivariable analyses, there was no association (HR: 95%CI) between ICI regimen and OS among pts with PD-L1 70–89% (1.1 [0.9–1.4]) or 90–100% (1.1 [0.9–1.3]), but pts with PD-L1 50–69% treated with ICI + chemo had longer OS (1.3 [1.1–1.7]). Table: 1105P

Outcomes following 1L ICI for aNSCLC with PD-L1 expression 50%

PD-L1 level, % 1L therapy Median (95%CI), months
Overall Trial-like
N PFS OS N PFS OS
All, ≥50 ICI mono 1639 5 (5-6) 13 (12-15) 605 6 (5-7) 18 (15-21)
ICI+chemo 992 7 (7-8) 17 (14-19) 424 8 (7-9) 19 (16-22)
50-69 ICI mono 199 4 (3-5) 11 (8-13) 133 5 (4-7) 15 (10-19)
ICI+chemo 124 7 (5-7) 15 (11-20) 104 6 (5-8) 16 (11-21)
70-89 ICI mono 651 5 (4-6) 13 (11-15) 163 6 (4-8) 17 (13-23)
ICI+chemo 423 7 (6-8) 13 (10-19) 127 7 (6-11) 20 (11-28)
90-100 ICI mono 789 6 (6-8) 18 (13-21) 309 7 (6-9) 21 (16-26)
ICI+chemo 445 9 (8-10) 19 (16-23) 193 10 (8-13) 22 (16-27)

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that outcomes in RW trial-like pts approach those reported in key pivotal ICI trials in high expressors and ICI mono may offer a potential alternative in those with PD-L1 levels ≥70%, while ICI + chemo may benefit those 50–69%. Further evaluation is warranted due to limitations of observational research.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Editorial support was provided by Daniel Himmel, PhD, of Prime, Knutsford, UK, funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and Sanofi.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi.

Funding

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi.

Disclosure

W. Ge, N. Wu, R. Quek, J.J. Jalbert, P. Rietschel: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. J. Liu: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Genesis Research, LLC. J. Feliciano: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Coherus, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Merck, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Takeda. J. Harnett: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.