Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini Oral session: CNS tumours

289MO - Next-generation sequencing (NGS) for identifying actionable molecular alterations in newly diagnosed and recurrent IDHwt-glioblastoma (GBM) patients: A large mono institutional experience

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Mini Oral session: CNS tumours

Topics

Targeted Therapy;  Molecular Oncology

Tumour Site

Central Nervous System Malignancies

Presenters

Marta Padovan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S122-S135. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1047

Authors

M. Padovan1, M. Maccari1, A. Bosio1, S. Vizzaccaro1, I. Cestonaro1, M. Corrà1, M. Caccese1, G. Cerretti1, M. fassan2, V. Zagonel1, G. Lombardi1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 - Padova/IT
  • 2 Department Of Medicine (dimed), Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padova, 35128 - Padova/IT

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 289MO

Background

NGS panels allow the identification of alterations within hundreds of cancer-related genes and can guide a personalized strategy in glioma treatment.

Methods

From Nov 2019 to Jan 2022 at Veneto Institute of Oncology, Padua, Italy, a large cohort of IDHwt-GBM tissues was analyzed by NGS (FoundationOne®CDx). We identified all potential actionable molecular alterations at diagnosis and/or at recurrence. High tumor mutational burden (TMB) was defined as ≥10 mutations/megabase.

Results

We analyzed 429 IDHwt-GBM samples: NGS profile was available for 419 samples (97.7%); sample failures in 10 cases (2.3%). 351 (84%) and 68 (16%) GBM samples derived from surgery at diagnosis and recurrence, respectively. All patients received radiotherapy and/or temozolomide as first line therapy. Among all the analyzed samples, the most frequent actionable molecular alterations were: CDKN2A (57%), CDKN2B (53%), EGFR amplification (39%), EGFR mutation (24%), PTEN loss (27%), RB1 (23%), NF1 (18%), PIK3CA (18%), CDK4 (15%), MDM2 (10%), PDGFRA (8%), BRCA1-2 (7%), FGFR1-3 (7%), Myc (6%), JAK (6%), ROS1 (5%), METmut (2%), METampl (2%), BRAF V600E (2%). No NTRK1/2/3 druggable alterations were observed. High TMB was found in 18 samples. The incidence of alteration of EGFR (ampl/mut), RB1, PIK3CA was statistically different between the two subgroups of newly diagnosed and relapsed GBM samples (Fisher test). To date, 10% of patients received a personalized treatment as compassionate use, off-label use or in clinical trials (9 Dabrafenib/Trametinib, 8 Alpelisib, 3 Erdafitinib, 2 Ipatasertib, 1 Alectinib, 1 Capmatinib, 1 Palbociclib, 1 Entrectinib, 1 Pamiparib). Activity analysis is still ongoing.

Conclusions

NGS is feasible in GBM samples. Potentially, a high rate of patients could receive a personalized treatment. The activity analysis is ongoing. However, the incidence of actionable molecular alterations may differ between diagnosis and recurrent GBM samples.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.