Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 09

558P - Molecular subtyping endometrial carcinoma in Chinese population applying an NGS-based classifier and its association with prognosis

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 09

Topics

Tumour Site

Endocrine Tumours

Presenters

Qing Zhang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S235-S282. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1054

Authors

Q. Zhang1, X. Ma1, W. Cao1, H. Wu1, K. Song1, C. Sun1, H. Liu2, F. Gai2, C. Zhu2, B. Kong1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Obstetrics And Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 250012 - Jinan/CN
  • 2 Medical Affair, Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd., 361027 - Xiamen/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 558P

Background

Molecular subtypes of EC is widely recognized and applied in clinics. While, it is still less recognized the distribution and prognostic value of molecular subtypes of endometrial carcinoma in Chinese population. An NGS-based classification strategy with reference to these two classifiers was developed and applied for the first time to explore the prognostic correlation of EC patients in China.

Methods

Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) tissue of 233 EC patients were retrospectively collected from Qilu Hospital, China. Genomic DNA was extracted and subjected to an all-in-one simplified NGS panel covering POLE, TP53 as well as MSI for subtyping. The information for ProMisE classification were also collected. With the median follow-up was 66 (range 7-122) months, overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were also been analyzed across the subtypes.

Results

Base on NGS panel classification, the fractions of POLE, MSI, CNH and CNL group were 8.15%, 18.88%, 11.59% and 61.37%, respectively. 61patients with ProMisE classification available, the fractions of the former subtypes were11.48%, 36.07%, 14.75%, and 37.70% respectively. The OS and DSS was (P=0.046 for OS, P=0.024 for DSS) significantly in the four subtypes based on NGS testing in 131 followed patients. There was no significant difference in OS (P = 0.91) and DSS (P = 0.95) across the four subtypes by ProMisE in 50 followed patients (Table). Table: 558P

Survival analysis results based on the two classifiers

NGS-based classifier(N=131)
POLE MSI CNH CNL P
8 years -OS rate 100% 80.00% 50.00% 92.26% 0.046
8 years -DSS rate 100% 88.89% 66.67% 100% 0.024
ProMisE classifier (N=50)
8 years -OS rate 83.33% 89.47% 100% 80.00% 0.91
8 years -DSS rate 100% 94.73% 100% 92.31% 0.95

Conclusions

The NGS-based strategy was confirmed to effectively classify four prognostically significant subgroups in endometrial cancer patients. Further analysis showed that the clinicopathological features of each molecular subtype were significantly different. All the results confirmed the feasibility of molecular subtyping of EC in clinical practice by a simplified NGS approach.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University.

Funding

Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.