Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 08

429P - Management of localized anal cancer and prognostic factors in the elderly: Results of the French multicenter cohort FFCD – ANABASE

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 08

Topics

Cancer in Older Adults

Tumour Site

Anal Cancer

Presenters

Claire GOURIOU

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S136-S196. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1048

Authors

C. GOURIOU1, C. Lemanski2, P. Pommier3, K. Le Malicot4, A. Saint5, E. Rivin del Campo6, C. EVIN6, L. Quero7, P. Regnault De La Motte8, N. Baba Hamed9, R. Philippe10, G. Crehange11, D. Tougeron12, E. Menager-Tabourel13, O. Diaz14, M. Hummelsberger15, A. de la Rochefordière11, F. Drouet16, V. Vendrely17, A. Lievre1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Ille Et Vilaine, CHU de Rennes - Hopital Pontchaillou, 35033 - Rennes, Cedex/FR
  • 2 Radiation Oncology, ICM Regional Cancer Institute of Montpellier, 34090 - Montpellier/FR
  • 3 Rhône, CRCL - Centre de recherche en cancerologie de Lyon, 69373 - Lyon, Cedex /FR
  • 4 Biostatistics, Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, 21079 - Dijon/FR
  • 5 Alpes Maritimes, Hopital del l'Archet, 6202 - Nice/FR
  • 6 Ile De France, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 - Paris/FR
  • 7 Radiation Oncology Dept, Hopital Saint Louis AP-HP, 75010 - Paris/FR
  • 8 Selarl Oncologie Radiotherapie, Clinique Tivoli Ducos, 33000 - Bordeaux/FR
  • 9 Hauts De Seine, ONCO CARC CANCER, 92130 - Issy-les-Moulineaux/FR
  • 10 Alpes Maritimes, Centre Azureen Cancerologie, 06250 - Mougins/FR
  • 11 Ile De France, Institut Curie, 75005 - Paris/FR
  • 12 Vienne, CHU Poitiers - Jean Bernard Hôpital, 86021 - Poitiers/FR
  • 13 Vendée, CHD Vendee - Hopital Les Oudairies, 85925 - La Roche-sur-Yon/FR
  • 14 Isère, Institut Daniel Hollard, 38028 - Grenoble/FR
  • 15 Medical Oncology Department, Oncodoc, 34500 - Béziers/FR
  • 16 Loire Atlantique, Clinique Mutualiste de l'Estuaire, 44606 - Saint-Nazaire/FR
  • 17 Gironde, CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, PESSAC/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 429P

Background

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is rare and 2/3 of patients (pts) are >65 years (y) at diagnosis. Standard of care for localized stages is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) but data about elderly are scarce in the literature. We aimed to describe characteristics, therapeutic management and outcomes of elderly pts and compare them to those of younger pts. We also determined prognostic factors in elderly with ASCC.

Methods

All consecutive pts treated between 2015/01 and 2020/04 for a localized ASCC from the French multicenter ANABASE cohort were included. Two groups were defined according to age: elderly (≥75 y) and non-elderly (<75 y).

Results

Among 1378 pts included, 1015 were treated by radiotherapy or CRT: 202 (19.9%) and 813 (80.1%) in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively. In the elderly group, median age was 79 y [IQR: 77-84], the proportion of women was more important (p=0.0145) while there were less performance status (PS) 0-1 (p<0.001), smokers (p<0.001) and HIV-infected (p<0.001) pts than in the non-elderly group. Other baseline and tumoral characteristics were similar. Inguinal irradiation and concomitant chemotherapy were also less frequently performed (p=0.04 and p<0.001). Median follow-up was 35.5 months. In the elderly group, 3-year overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and colostomy-free survival (CFS) were 82.9% (75.6-88.2), 72.4% (64.7-78.8) and 78.0% (70.5-83.9), respectively. Complete response rate at 4-6 months of treatment was 70.3%. There was no significant difference for all outcomes and in toxicity patterns between groups. In multivariate analyses for the elderly group, PS≥2 and locally advanced (T3-T4 or N+) tumors were associated with poor OS (HR=3.4 [1.4;8.3] and HR=2.80 [1.2;7.1]), RFS (HR=2.4 [1.2;4.9] and HR=3.1 [1.5;6.4]) and CFS (HR=3.8 [1.8;8.1] and HR=3.0 [1.4;6.7]), and treatment interruption was associated with poor RFS (HR=1.9 [1.1;3.5]).

Conclusions

In ANABASE cohort, age does not influence tumor and tolerance outcomes of localized ASCC. The optimal curative treatment should be offered to elderly pts after oncogeriatric assessment.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive.

Funding

Fédération Fran.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.