Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 07

20P - Liquid biopsy of early-stage lung cancer using extracellular vesicles

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 07

Topics

Tumour Site

Small Cell Lung Cancer;  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Razelle Kurzrock

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S4-S18. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1035

Authors

R. Kurzrock1, J.P. Hinestrosa2, J.M. Lewis2, H. Balcer3, G. Schroeder2, P. Billings4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Mcw Cancer Center And Genomic Sciences And Precision Medicine Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, 53226 - Milwaukee/US
  • 2 Research, Biological Dynamics, Inc., 92121 - San Diego/US
  • 3 Commercial Operations Department, Biological Dynamics, Inc., 92121 - San Diego/US
  • 4 Ceo, Biological Dynamics, San Diego/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 20P

Background

Lung cancer is one of the most common and deadliest cancers with a 5-year survival rate of ∼ 20%. Approximately 70% of cases are detected when the disease is regional or distant and have lower survival rates than localized cancers. Improving the number of cases detected in a localized state could lead to better patient outcomes.

Methods

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) plasma samples were tested for protein biomarkers carried by extracellular vesicles (EVs) following isolation and analysis using multiplex ELISA. In total, 161 lung cancer cases (Stage I = 88, Stage II = 34, Stage III = 20, Stage IV = 19) and 683 control subjects (no known cancer diagnosis) were analyzed. The case cohort consisted of 41% smokers with a median age of 63 years and 42% female population while the control cohort consisted of 12% smokers with a median age of 58 years and 52% female population.

Results

A machine learning algorithm identified an initial set of 35 informative EV biomarkers for differentiation of NSCLC cases from controls. The ROC showed an AUC of 0.987 (95% CI: 0.981 – 0.993) with a sensitivity of 97% (CI: 93% - 99%) at a specificity of 92% (CI: 90% - 94%). When performance was broken down by stage, we found similar performance across all stages tested with sensitivities of 98%, 94%, 95% and 100% for stages I – IV, respectively. We then reduced the number of biomarkers used from 35 to 11 to identify the most informative, yielding a 92% sensitivity at 92% specificity. To better understand performance in a future independent validation, we performed an in-silico experiment randomly partitioning the dataset into ten training and validation sets (67%/33%). This showed a mean AUC of 0.982 (range 0.968-0.991), mean sensitivity of 95% (range 85% - 100%) and mean specificity of 92% (range 86% - 95%) across the ten held-out validation sets.

Conclusions

Our pilot study suggests a potential approach for detecting lung cancer at early stages, when treatment can be more effective, by using a liquid biopsy test based on EV biomarkers. Our results warrant further testing with independent datasets for biomarker and algorithm validation. Future planned studies will also evaluate the impact of controls with confounding disorders, such benign lung nodules, as well as COPD to better evaluate the best use in the clinical setting.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Biological Dynamics.

Disclosure

J.P. Hinestrosa: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Biological Dynamics. J.M. Lewis, H. Balcer, G. Schroeder: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Biological Dynamics. P. Billings: Financial Interests, Institutional, Member of the Board of Directors: Biological Dynamics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.