Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 01

99P - Landscape of homologous recombination repair gene mutations in different molecular subtypes of NSCLC

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 01

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Lianke Liu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S27-S54. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1037

Authors

L. Liu1, F. xu1, W. sun2, Y. He2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 210029 - Nanjing/CN
  • 2 Medical Department, Geneplus-Beijing Institute, 102206 - Beijing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 99P

Background

Lung cancer is one of the malignant tumors with high morbidity and mortality in the world. PARP inhibitors have become a new line of cancer therapy The mechanism and efficacy of PARP inhibitors have been well studied in some cancers, especially homologous recombination (HR)-deficient ovarian cancer, and several cell line experiments have shown that HR-deficient lung cancers are sensitive to PARP inhibitor. Meanwhile, HHR gene is a potential biomarker for immunotherapy. Herein, we evaluated the characteristics of HRR related gene mutations in Chinese patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) or lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC).

Methods

Tumor specimens from 748 NSCLC patients were analyzed by DNA based NGS with a 1021 gene panel in this study. We analyzed 36 HRR genes, including CHEK1/2, BRCA1/2, BRIP1, CDK12, ATM/ATR, FANCA/C/D2/E/F/G/L/M, MRE11A, NBN, RAD50/51/52, RAD51B/C/D et al.

Results

666 of 746 patients were LUAD and 82 patients were LUSC. The proportions of HRR gene mutations in LUAD was 32.28% (215/666) and in LUSC was 41.5% (34/82). The top 5 mutated HRR genes in LUAD were TAM (35/666, 5.26%), FANCM (33/666, 4.95%), CDK12 (21/666, 3.15%), BRCA2 (21/666, 3.15%), ATR (18/666, 2.70%). In LUSC, the top 5 mutated HRR genes were BRCA2 (10/82, 12.2%), ATR (6/82, 7.32%), FANCM (6/82, 7.32%), FANCA (5/82, 6.10%), CDK12 (5/82, 6.10%). Interestingly, BRCA1 gene mutation was not found in LUSC. There was a significant difference in the frequency of five HRR genes between LUAD and LUSC, including BRCA2 (P=0.00034), CHEK2 (P=0.03521), FANCG (P=0.0009), BLM (P=0.02572), FAM175A. (P=0.03012). The proportion of tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) (≥10 mut/Mb) was significantly higher in HRR mutant than HRR wild-type LUAD or LUSC (LUAD: 36.84% vs 8.82%,P<0.0001, LUSC: 75.86% vs 32.08%,P<0.0001).

Conclusions

In terms of HRR gene mutations, we report that LUAD and LUSC have different mutation landscape. Mutations in HRR genes may serve as a biomarker for PARP inhibitors or ICIs in LUAD and LUSC, which also needs more trials to verify.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.