Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 19

CN83 - Interventions to alleviate depression and anxiety in women with ovarian cancer to improve mental health and health-related quality of life

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 19

Topics

Tumour Site

Ovarian Cancer

Presenters

Kirsty Mackenzie

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S827-S836. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1046

Authors

K. Mackenzie1, G. Kotronoulas2

Author affiliations

  • 1 School Of Nursing And Healthcare, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ - Glasgow/GB
  • 2 School Of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ - Glasgow/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract CN83

Background

Patients with ovarian cancer, who also deal with depression and/or anxiety, are at a significantly greater risk of higher mortality rates, increased hospital stays, poorer mental health and, reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This structured review aims to critically appraise and synthesise up to date evidence on the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions to combat anxiety and depression, to improve mental health and HRQoL in women with ovarian cancer at any point in the cancer trajectory. We explored the effectiveness of diverse interventions to combat depression and/or anxiety in adult women with a confirmed ovarian cancer diagnosis, offered at any point in the cancer trajectory.

Methods

According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines, peer reviewed publications of true and quasi-experimental studies were identified through a search of the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica Online (Embase), and medical Literature Online (MEDLINE) databases from 2008 to 2021. The Critical Appraisal Framework for Original Research (CAFFOR) was used to to assess methodological rigour. Findings were synthesised using quantitative grouping and a narrative critical analysis.

Results

Seven studies were selected for the analysis of the findings and methodology of each paper and the discussion. The interventions were grouped into three different types: nurse-led, CBT-based, and exercise. Irrespective of type, the reviewed supportive care interventions seem to be beneficial in reducing patients' distress and enhancing HRQoL among ovarian cancer survivors.

Conclusions

Focusing on people living with ovarian cancer, particularly at the early stages of development, may help improve the mortality rate of the patient group. To improve mental health and HRQoL in this group of patients, more rigorous development of existing interventions is necessary, as well as early screening for mental health deficits. Nurses play an essential role in improving mental health and HRQoL for women with ovarian cancer by leading and/or supporting delivery of complex supportive care interventions.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The University of Glasgow.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.