Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 14

774P - Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy and the risk of venous thromboembolism in cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 14

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Nihal Khan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S331-S355. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1058

Authors

N.I. Khan1, S.A.A. Naqvi2, H. Ijaz3, K.Z.R. Khakwani4, I.B. Riaz5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Internal Medicine, AIMC - Allama Iqbal Medical College - Jinnah Hospital, 54550 - Lahore/PK
  • 2 Division Of Hematology And Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, 85054 - Phoenix/US
  • 3 Medical College, Nishtar Medical College and Hospital - NMC, 60000 - Multan/PK
  • 4 Department Of Internal Medicine, The University of Arizona, 85721 - Tucson/US
  • 5 Oncology, Medicine, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 02115 - Boston/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 774P

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, an emerging class of cancer treatment, is being actively investigated in multiple trials. However, the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with ICI drugs remains unexplored.

Methods

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched through 25th April 2022 to identify full text publications of phase 2/3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing ICI monotherapy compared to either chemotherapy or placebo and reporting adverse events. Main outcome of interest was VTE risk. A fixed-effect Peto meta-analysis was conducted to pool binary events data. Treatment effect estimates were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Additional analyses were conducted by types of VTEs (deep vein thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE]), and class of ICI (PD1, PDL1). A sensitivity analysis using empirical informative priors was also conducted within the Bayesian framework.

Results

Of initial 16144 citations identified, 55 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. However, only 45 (61 references) reported VTE and were included in this meta-analysis; 35 trials comparing ICI monotherapy with chemotherapy in 19696 patients and only 10 trials comparing ICI monotherapy with placebo in 7191 patients. A total of 152 VTE events (1.44%) were observed in ICI monotherapy compared to 149 VTE events (1.64%) observed in chemotherapy arm. The difference was not statistically significant (OR: 0.87 95% CI: 0.69-1.09). Similarly, 35 VTE events (0.85%) were observed with ICI monotherapy as compared to 24 VTE events (0.78%) in placebo arm (Table). The difference was not statistically significant (OR: 0.95 95% CI: 0.56-1.61). The results were consistent for different types of VTE (DVT and PE), class of ICI (PD1 and PDL1), and by Bayesian meta-analysis. Table: 774P

Venous thromboembolism risk

Participants (RCTs) Relative risk (95% CI) Anticipated absolute risks
Risk with Control Risk difference with ICI
ICI vs Chemotherapy 19696 OR 0.87 16 per 1000 2 fewer per 1,000
35 RCTs (0.69 to 1.09) (5 fewer to 1 more)
ICI vs Placebo 7191 OR: 0.95 8 per 1,000 0 fewer per 1,000
10 RCTs (0.56 to 1.61) (3 fewer to 5 more)

Conclusions

ICI monotherapy may not be associated with an increased risk of VTE in patients with cancer when compared to either chemotherapy or placebo.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Nihal Ijaz Khan.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.