Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 15

1096P - Identifying predictive biomarkers for long term response on immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 15

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Lore Decoster

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S448-S554. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1064

Authors

L. Decoster1, S. Nazari2, K. De Ridder3, P. Giron4, K. Vekens5, C. Goyvaerts6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel - Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 - Jette/BE
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Faculty of Medicine & Pharmacy, 1090 - Brussels/BE
  • 3 Laboratory For Molecular And Cellular Therapy, Department Of Biomedical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Faculty of Medicine & Pharmacy, 1090 - Brussels/BE
  • 4 Department Of Clinical Genetics, UZ Brussel - Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 - Jette/BE
  • 5 Respiratory Division, UZ Brussel - Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 - Jette/BE
  • 6 Laboratory For Molecular And Cellular Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Faculty of Medicine & Pharmacy, 1090 - Brussels/BE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1096P

Background

Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) pathway targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard of care for advanced NSCLC. Today, histological expression of PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) is the only approved predictive biomarker for response. Yet, ICI treatment can lead to durable or absence of response in patients with low/absent or high PD-L1 resp., indicating that PD-L1 expression is not an ideal biomarker. Further, it remains unclear whether we can define a subgroup that remains progression free after therapy withdrawal. This retrospective pilot study aspires to identify superior biomarkers for long term vs nonresponsive patients and to guide ICI therapy duration.

Methods

Advanced NSCLC patients with complete and persistent metabolic response (‘responders’, n=5) versus absence of response (‘non-responders’ with >60% PD-L1, n=5) upon ICI therapy were included. Inflammation-related blood biomarkers were compared. From pre-treatment biopsies, RNA and DNA was extracted for respective transcriptional and genomic analysis. Differential gene expression analysis (DESeq2 package) and gene ranking-based gene set enrichment analysis were performed to identify gene oncology biological processes. We used the Mutect2T tool for DNA reads variant calling and tumor mutational burden (TMB) evaluation.

Results

While none of the investigated blood biomarkers showed a significant difference between both cohorts, RNA analysis showed 546 significantly expressed genes (p< 0,1). In brief, upregulated genes in the responder group were linked to immune effector response, phagocytosis and myeloid/mast cell activation. Significantly downregulated genes in the responder group were more abundant and mainly linked to epithelial development, cell-cell adhesion, cytoskeletal rearrangements, and endocrine metabolic processes. While no differences in the TMB profiles were observed, the non-responders harbored more mutations in the following genes: TP53, CDKN2A, MSH6, GNAQ and CSMD3.

Conclusions

Evaluation of two extremes of the ICI response spectrum in NSCLC patients showed significant differences with biomarker potential in terms of patient stratification and duration of ICI therapy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

L. Decoster: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Roche, MSD, Lilly, BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.