Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 03

301P - Hypofractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas in younger and good performance status patients during COVID-19 pandemic

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 03

Topics

COVID-19 and Cancer

Tumour Site

Central Nervous System Malignancies

Presenters

Ana Carmo Valente

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S122-S135. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1047

Authors

A.C. Valente1, C. Lopes Almeida2, M.J. Costa3, I.C. Nogueira Costa4, J.S. Reis5, M.C.B. Freitas6, C.M. Teixeira7, M.V. Gonçalves6, A.C. Fernandes5, A.S.A. Costa8, C.L.B. Caeiro8, L. Osório9, I.M. Augusto10, M. Barbosa5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Dept., CHUSJ - Centro Hospitalar Sao Joao E.P.E - SNS - Polo Porto, 4200-319 - Porto/PT
  • 2 Oncology Department, CHUSJ - Centro Hospitalar Sao Joao E.P.E - SNS - Polo Porto, 4200-319 - Porto/PT
  • 3 Serviço De Oncologia Médica, CHUSJ - Centro Hospitalar Sao Joao E.P.E - SNS - Polo Porto, 4200-319 - Porto/PT
  • 4 Medical Oncology Service, CHUSJ - Centro Hospitalar Sao Joao E.P.E - Polo Porto, 4200-319 - Porto/PT
  • 5 Medical Oncology Department, CHUSJ - Centro Hospitalar Sao Joao E.P.E - SNS - Polo Porto, 4200-319 - Porto/PT
  • 6 Medical Oncology Department, Centro Hospitalar Sao Joao E.P.E - Polo Porto, 4200–319 - Porto/PT
  • 7 Oncology Department, são joão university hospital center, Porto/PT
  • 8 Medical Oncology Department, HSJ - Hospital de Sao Joao Centro Hospitalar Universitario, EPE - SNS, 4200-319 - Porto/PT
  • 9 Radiotherapy, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João - Porto, 4200-319 - Porto/PT
  • 10 Oncologia Médica, CHUSJ - Centro Hospitalar Sao Joao E.P.E - SNS - Polo Porto, 4200-319 - Porto/PT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 301P

Background

During the initial approach to the COVID-19 pandemic, some international recommendations regarding high-grade gliomas (HGG) favored the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFR) regiments, particularly in elderly and frail patients. In our institution, to reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection and the treatment interruptions, the multidisciplinary group decided to carry out a modified STUPP protocol (HFR - 40,05Gy/15 fractions over 3 weeks - with TMZ), even in younger patients with good performance status (PS). However, a few data exist about the role of HFR in this subgroup of patients.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients with a newly diagnosed HGG treated with chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) followed by adjuvant TMZ, between 2016 and 2021. Patients with ≤ 70 years old and ECOG PS ≤ 2, treated with conventional fraction RT (CFR, 60Gy/30 fractions, over 6 weeks) or HFR concurrent with TMZ (75 mg/m2/day), followed by adjuvant TMZ (150-200 mg/m2/day for 5 days, every 4 weeks) were included. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors assessed by univariate analysis and by the Cox regression model.

Results

A total of 157 patients were included, with a median age of 56 years old (26-69). The majority (82,2%) was submited to surgical resection. About 24% (n=37) were treated with HFR-TMZ and 76% (n=120) with CFR-TMZ. The most frequent adverse event was thrombocytopenia (n=39), with no difference between groups (p=0,828). The patients treated with HFR had a median overall survival (mOS) of 18 months vs. 21 months with CFR (p=0,221). The median progression free survival (mPFS) was 13 months for patients treated with HFR, and 10 months for CFR (p=0,418). In multivariate analysis, IDH mutation (OS: HR 0,47; 95% CI 0,26-0,86; p= 0,014. PFS: HR 0,47; 95% CI 0,27-0,84; p=0,010) and absence of corticotherapy (OS: HR 0,65; 95% CI 0,44-0,98; p=0,038. PFS: HR 0,65; 95% CI 0,44-0,97, p=0,034) had a positive impact on OS and PFS.

Conclusions

According to our data, in HGG patients with ≤70 years old and a good PS, the use of HFR with TMZ had no impact on median PFS and OS, when compared with CFR-TMZ. However, the role of HFR in this setting needs further research.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.