Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 01

131P - Frequency of germline testing after tumor sequencing by cancer type

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 01

Topics

Clinical Research;  Genetic and Genomic Testing

Tumour Site

Presenters

Hannah Karpel

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S27-S54. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1037

Authors

H.C. Karpel1, B. Pothuri2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Obstetrics And Gynecology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 10016 - New York/US
  • 2 Obstetrics And Gynecology Dept, Oncology Division, NYU Langone Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, 10016 - New York/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 131P

Background

Tumor next generation sequencing (NGS) is used to identify somatic mutations. It can also identify potential germline mutations associated with cancer susceptibility. We aimed to describe the frequency of actionable tumor NGS results that met ESMO 2019 guidelines for germline genetic testing (GT), germline GT receipt and positive GT results in a large cancer cohort.

Methods

Patients with tumor NGS from Sept 2019-Feb 2022 in a large health system in New York City were retrospectively identified. ESMO guidelines were used to identify potentially actionable germline mutations on NGS (Mandelker et al. 2019).

Results

Of 3796 patients who underwent tumor NGS, 454 (12.0%) had at least one potential actionable germline mutation per ESMO guidelines. Cancer types with over 20% of patients whose tumor NGS results met ESMO criteria for germline GT included ampullary, ovarian, uterine, liver, skin, mesothelioma, and thyroid. The most common tumor mutations identified were BRCA2 [26.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 22.6-31.0], BRCA1 [14.1%, CI 11.0-17.6], MUTYH [9.9%, CI 7.3-13.0], MSH6 [7.9%, CI 5.6-10.8], and TSC2 [6.8%, CI 4.7-9.6]. Overall, 162 (35.7%) eligible patients per ESMO guidelines received germline GT, of which the most likely cancer types were ovarian (91.1%), pancreatic (66.7%), breast (58.3%), thyroid (50.0%), and uterine (46.9%) (Table). Of 162 patients who underwent germline GT, 98 (60.5%) had positive GT results with the most common cancer types being bone marrow (100%), esophageal (100%), ovarian (80.5%), pancreatic (66.7%) and lung (64.3%). Distribution of positive GT results was: 39 BRCA2; 24 BRCA1; 12 MUTYH; 6 BRIP1; 4 RAD51C; 4 PALB2; 3 MSH6; 2 CHEK2; 2 MSH2; 2 RAD51D; and one each of SDHA, MLH1, NF1, PMS2. Table: 131P

Outcomes by cancer type

Cancer type Number of cases Positive tumor NGS, N (%) Received germline GT, N (%) Positive germline GT, N (%)
Total 3796 454 (12.0) 162 (35.7) 98 (60.5)
Lung 1195 110 (9.2) 14 (12.7) 9 (64.3)
Colorectal 399 41 (10.3) 9 (22.0) 2 (22.2)
Breast 335 36 (10.7) 21 (58.3) 12 (57.1)
Prostate 308 50 (16.2) 18 (36.0) 11 (61.1)
Pancreatic 296 36 (12.2) 24 (66.7) 16 (66.7)
Bone Marrow 233 8 (3.4) 1 (12.5) 1 (100.0)
Ovarian 177 45 (25.4) 41 (91.1) 33 (80.5)
Uterine 149 32 (21.5) 15 (46.9) 7 (46.7)
Liver 92 20 (21.7) 6 (30.0) 3 (50.0)
Esophageal 46 2 (4.3) 1 (50.0) 1 (100.0)
Thyroid 18 4 (22.2) 2 (50.0) 0

Conclusions

Of 12% of patients who met ESMO criteria for germline GT, only 35% received GT and among those tested, 60% had a germline mutation. Mutations were prevalent across cancer types, highlighting the need for clinicians to know and implement society guidelines.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

B. Pothuri: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Clinical Practice Committee Chair, Board of Directors, COVID-19 Taskforce Co-chair: Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Gynecologic Oncology Group; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Society Secretary: New York Obstetrical Society; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board, Advisory board consulting fee + clinical trial support at NYU: Clovis Oncology, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Sutro, Tesaro/GSK, Merck, Mersana, Seattle Genetics, Toray; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory board consulting fee, support for attending meetings: Gynecologic Oncology Group; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory board consulting fee: Lilly, Atossa, Elevar, Deciphera, Imab, Arquer Diagnostics; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Bioascend, PERS, Vanium, OncLive; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, clinical trial support at NYU: Karyopharm, Immunogen, VBL Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech, Celsion, Takeda, Incyte. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.