Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 02

226P - Exploring the impact of first-line therapies on the metastatic behavior of luminal-like metastatic breast cancer (mBC)

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 02

Topics

Clinical Research

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Roberta Mazzeo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S88-S121. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1040

Authors

R. Mazzeo1, B. Pastò1, D. Basile2, L. Bortot1, L. Cucciniello1, A. Dri1, C. Noto1, S. Buriolla1, L. Palmero1, A. Membrino1, M. Bonotto3, C. Lisanti4, S. Russo3, A.M.M. Minisini3, G. Fasola3, L. Gerratana4, F. Puglisi5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medicine (dame), University of Udine, 33100 - Udine/IT
  • 2 Unit Of Medical Oncology, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, 88900 - Crotone/IT
  • 3 Department Of Oncology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), 33100 - Udine/IT
  • 4 Unit Of Medical Oncology And Cancer Prevention, Department Of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 - Aviano/IT
  • 5 Department Of Medicine (dame), 33100 Udine, Italy. Unit Of Medical Oncology And Cancer Prevention, Department Of Medical Oncology, Centro Di Riferimento Oncologico Di Aviano (cro), Irccs, 33081 Aviano, Italy., University of Udine, 33100 - Udine/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 226P

Background

The pattern of metastatic spreading in luminal-like mBC is a current field of research, but few data are available on the evolution of distant involvement after first-line (1L). We aimed to describe the trend in metastatic sites after progression to a 1L.

Methods

The study retrospectively analysed 717 consecutive luminal-like mBC patients (pts) treated at the Oncology Departments of Aviano and Udine, in Italy, between 2008 and 2020, with endocrine therapy (ET) (alone or in combination with cyclin-dependent-kinases 4/6 inhibitors [CDK4/6i]) or chemotherapy (CT) (alone or with ET maintenance). Data were collected at baseline of 1L (BL1) and at progression (PD1). McNemar and Fisher tests were used to explore pairwise differences and associations between newly identified metastatic sites and 1L treatments.

Results

Overall, bone involvement was 71.2% at BL1 and 76.4% at PD1, lung metastasis (mts) was detected in 21.7% of pts at BL1 and in 32.3% at PD1, liver mts in 21.4% at BL1 and in 31.6% at PD1. Central nervous system (CNS) mts were detected in 2.4% of pts at BL1 and in 3.5% at PD1. In the overall population, at paired nominal data test, metastatic sites were consistently increased at PD1 (liver P < 0.0001, bone P = 0.0001, CNS P = 0.0039, bone-only P < 0.0001, lung P < 0.0001, nodes P < 0.0001), as expected. Notably, a similar trend was observed across all 1L treatments, apart for CNS mts in the ET cohort, bone and CNS in both the ET+CDK4/6i and CT subgroups, bone-only disease and CNS mts in CT-ET maintenance group where no significant pairwise changes were highlighted. Analysing newly identified metastatic sites at PD1, pts treated with ET+CDK4/6i had a higher risk of developing new CNS mts (P = 0.018, expected frequency [EF] 1.1 pts vs observed frequency [OF] 3 pts), while pts treated with CT-ET maintenance had a higher risk of developing new lymph node mts (P = 0.014, EF 32.5 pts vs OF 45 pts).

Conclusions

The present study suggested the potential impact of first-line treatment strategies on the evolution of metastatic spreading in luminal-like mBC. Based on these results, future studies will be designed to develop new personalized monitoring strategies.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

A.M.M. Minisini: Other, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis, MSD, Pierre-Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, honoraria: Novartis, Merck, MSD, Sunpharma, Pierre-Fabre. L. Gerratana: Other, Personal, Other, personal fees: Eli Lilly, Novartis. F. Puglisi: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant, grants/research: AstraZeneca, Eisai, Roche; Other, Personal, Other, honoraria or consultation fees: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Celgene, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, Takeda, Viatris. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.