Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 05

1583P - Evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge after immune-related adverse events in patients with cancer

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 05

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Xin-ran Tang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S713-S742. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1075

Authors

X. Tang, R. Li, F. Zhao, X. Wen, Y. Wang, R. Lv

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, 510515 - Guangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1583P

Background

Safety of a rechallenge with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after an immune-related adverse event (irAE) remains unclear, especially for those patients with ICI class switch.

Methods

All adverse drug reactions involving at least one ICI reported up to December 31, 2021 were extracted from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The primary outcome was the recurrence of the initial irAE after an ICI rechallenge with original or different regimen (anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 as one class and anti-CTLA-4 as another class). Secondary outcomes included the factors associated with the recurrence after a rechallenge.

Results

We identified a total of 24092 irAE cases associated with at least one cycle of ICI, which 174 irAEs was associated with ICI rechallenge among 586 patients. For patient with single agent ICI, those rechallenged with different ICI regimen was associated with higher recurrence rate of irAEs than those with original ICI regimen (46.6% vs. 26.5%, p=0.002). Similar tendency has been observed in patients with combination therapy which rechallenged with different ICI regimen was associated with higher recurrence rate of irAEs (75% vs. 28.7%, p=0.006). In a rechallenge, factors such as rechallenge with different ICI regimen, initial treatment cycle, administration of steroids and multiple irAEs were associated with higher irAE recurrence rate. Table: 1583P

IrAEs recurrence after ICI rechallenge in single-agent group

Initial ICI Regime of ICI rechallenge All patients irAEs recurrence No irAEs recurrence P value
Anti-CTLA4 0.152
Anti-CTLA4 19 4(21.1%) 15(78.9%)
Anti-PD-(L)1 24 10(41.67%) 14(58.33%)
Anti-PD-1 or Anti-PD-L1 0.004
Anti-CTLA4 31 16(51.6%) 15 (48.4%)
Anti-PD-(L)1 361 97(26.9%) 264(73.1%)

Conclusions

This study found a 29.7% recurrence rate of the same irAE associated with the discontinuation of ICI therapy after rechallenge. In terms of class switch, those rechallenged with different ICI regimen was associated with higher recurrence rate of irAEs than those with original ICI regimen.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.