Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 14

1001P - Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing and treatment patterns associated with diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) in the US

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 14

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Zofia Piotrowska

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S448-S554. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1064

Authors

Z. Piotrowska1, M. Lin2, Y. Yin2, E. Curran2, V. Crossland2, Y. Wu2, S.I. Ou3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 02114 - Boston/US
  • 2 Global Evidence And Outcomes Research, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., 02421 - Lexington/US
  • 3 Division Of Hematology/ Oncology, University of California Irvine, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 92868 - Orange/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1001P

Background

With new targeted therapies approved for patients with NSCLC with EGFRex20ins, it is important to understand real-world diagnosis and treatment choice, as these mutations are associated with poor prognosis and require tailored treatment.

Methods

The Flatiron Health electronic health record database was used to identify 75,067 patients with advanced NSCLC from 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2021. EGFR testing rates and proportion of tests done with next-generation sequencing (NGS) were described for all patients. First-line (1L) treatments were described for patients with EGFRex20ins(+) results in the last 5 years (2017-2021), stratified by initiation of 1L before or after EGFRex20ins(+) testing result.

Results

Overall, 67% of patients were tested for EGFR mutations (n=51,470). EGFR testing rates and the proportion of tests done with NGS increased from 2011 to 2021 (44.4 to 80.7% and <1.0 to 81.0%, respectively). Among patients with EGFRex20ins(+) results 2011-2017 (n = 250), 59 (24%) started 1L treatment prior to and 141 (56%) started 1L after their first EGFRex20ins(+) (50 were unknown). A higher proportion of patients received EGFR TKIs or were enrolled in clinical trials, and a lower proportion received chemotherapy if they started 1L treatment after their first EGFRex20ins(+) result, when compared to patients who started 1L treatment before. Similar proportions of patients were treated with IO monotherapy or IO + chemotherapy regardless of when treatment was started (table). Table: 1001P

1L treatments in patients with EFRex20ins 2017-2021

Started treatment before EGFRex20ins (+) result n (%) Started treatment after EGFRex20ins (+) result n (%)
n = 59 n = 141
Chemotherapy 27 (45.8) 36 (25.5)
IO monotherapy 5 (8.5) 16 (11.3)
IO + chemotherapy 21 (35.6) 44 (31.2)
EGFR TKI 4 (6.8) 32 (22.7)
Clinical Trial 1 (1.7) 12 (8.5)
Other 1 (1.7) 1 (0.7)

Conclusions

EGFR testing increased over time; however, 20% of patients still remained untested in 2021. Among patients with EGFRex20ins mutations, a high proportion of patients started IO or EGFR TKIs after genetic testing despite limited effectiveness in this population. With the recent approval of therapies targeting EGFRex20ins mutations, increased testing and awareness of treatment outcomes in this population are needed.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing assistance provided by Jane Kondejewski, PhD of SNELL Medical Communication, Inc.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.

Funding

Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.

Disclosure

Z. Piotrowska: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Participated in a Janssen-sponsored educational program: Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Janssen, Takeda, Cullinan, C4 Therapeutics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Participated as an invited speaker in an internal education program at Daiichi Sankyo: Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Participated in a (non-promotional) Eli Lilly sponsored medical education event about biomarker testing in NSCLC.: Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Institutional research funding for clinical trial: Novartis, Takeda, Spectrum, AstraZeneca, Tesaro/GSK, Cullinan, Daiichi Sankyo, AbbVie, Janssen, Blueprint; Financial Interests, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: Cullinan. M. Lin, Y. Yin, E. Curran, V. Crossland, Y. Wu: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. S.I. Ou: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: JNJ/Janssen, Elevation Oncology; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Turning Point Therapeutics, Elevation Oncology; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Pfizer, Mirati, JNJ/Janssen, Merus.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.