Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 09

597P - Endometrial carcinoma and mismatch repair deficiency: Clinical association and universal screening for Lynch syndrome

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 09

Topics

Tumour Site

Gynaecological Malignancies

Presenters

Silvia Puglisi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S235-S282. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1054

Authors

S. Puglisi1, M. Ponzano2, M. Perachino1, C. Pirrone1, A. Damassi1, G. Bregni3, A. Puccini1, M. Grassi1, L. Trevisan4, V. Gismondi4, M. Dono5, S. Lastraioli5, P. Fedele6, M. Cremante1, A. Gandini1, F. Giannelli7, S. Mammoliti1, V.G. Vellone8, M.S. Sciallero1, M.L. Iaia1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 - Genova/IT
  • 2 Department Of Health Sciences (dissal), IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 - Genova/IT
  • 3 Université Libre De Bruxelles, Institut Jules Bordet, 1050 - Brussels/BE
  • 4 Ss Tumori Ereditari, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 - Genova/IT
  • 5 Pathology- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 - Genova/IT
  • 6 Oncology Unit, Ospedale Dario Camberlingo, 72021 - Francavilla Fontana/IT
  • 7 Radioterapia Oncologica-ss Radioterapia Pediatrica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 - Genova/IT
  • 8 Dipartimento Di Scienze Chirurgiche E Diagnostiche Integrate, Università Di Genova, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino,Pathology Unit, 16132 - Genova/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 597P

Background

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is characterised by a high rate of DNA Mismatch Repair deficiency (dMMR). Testing for dMMR might have implications for EC prognosis and is part of Universal Screening (US) for Lynch syndrome (LS) diagnosis. However, this is not widely implemented yet, and LS is still underdiagnosed. For these reasons, we aimed to evaluate dMMR prevalence, its association with clinicopathological variables and its role for LS diagnosis for EC patients.

Methods

This is a monocentric retrospective study on 368 consecutive EC cases (stages I-IV). From 2013 to 2020 they underwent surgery and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis for dMMR. We collected age, date of surgery, tumor histotype, grading, FIGO stage at diagnosis, lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), and survival status. We then assessed the proportion of dMMR patients on the entire cohort. Major outcome were OS and RFS in the dMMR patients compared to MMR proficient cases (pMMR). Among the dMMR cases, we reported those who underwent genetic testing and had LS.

Results

dMMR was found in 91/368 EC patients (25%). 84 had endometroid histotype, 7 other histotypes (92% vs 8% p= 0.010), 50 had G2 nuclear grading vs 19 G1 and 22 G3 (55% vs 21% vs 24%; p=0.005). As compared to pMMR at a 4-year follow-up an unfavorable trend in OS and RFS was observed for patients with dMMR (4 y OS 82% vs 74% p=0.115, 4 y RFS 70% vs 54% p-value=0.153). In multivariate analysis, age (p<0.001), histotype and grade (p<0.001), stage (p=0.003) and LVSI (p=0.010) were independently associated to OS. dMMR only showed a trend in worse OS (p=0.10). Among the 91 patients with dMMR, only 5 underwent genetic counseling (GC)(6.6%): LS was diagnosed in 1 patient (20%) with loss of MSH2/MSH6 expression.

Conclusions

This is the largest Italian cohort of US for LS. dMMR prevalence was 25%, mainly associated with endometrioid type, G2 grading and a worse 4 y OS, as compared to pMMR cases, consistent with the literature. Unfortunately, oncologists' compliance with US for LS is still very poor, with a 6.6% GC referral. This should be implemented according to international guidelines, to increase LS diagnosis, reduce mortality in relatives and incidence of second cancers in survived patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.