Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 08

541P - Efficacy of various anticancer agents after failure of maintenance olaparib: A retrospective study

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 08

Topics

Clinical Research;  Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Ovarian Cancer

Presenters

Alexey Rumyantsev

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S235-S282. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1054

Authors

A. Rumyantsev1, A. Tyulyandina1, E. Glazkova2, I. Pokataev3, S. Tjulandin4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology And Chemotherapy №4, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 115478 - Moscow/RU
  • 2 Medical Oncology And Chemotherapy №1, N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow/RU
  • 3 Medical Oncology And Chemotherapy №2, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 115478 - Moscow/RU
  • 4 Medical Oncology And Chemotherapy №2, National Medical Research Center of Oncology named after N.N. Blokhin, 115478 - Moscow/RU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 541P

Background

maintenance therapy with PARP-inhibitors (PARPi) may alter efficacy of further chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (aEOC). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate efficacy of various therapeutic agents in aEOC patients who progressed after maintenance olaparib therapy.

Methods

we extracted data for patients with BRCA-positive aEOC who progressed after maintenance olaparib therapy from a prospectively maintained institutional database for 2014-2022 years. Using Cox proportional hazards regression model we analyzed the impact of various platinum, non-platinum and antiangiogenic agents on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients after subsequent anticancer therapy. Statistical analysis was done with R and RStudio software.

Results

we identified 146 patients who received maintenance olaparib in the specified timeline, of them 61 (41.7%) patients were treated with subsequent chemotherapy and had available outcomes data. Median duration of previous olaparib therapy was 11.5 mo., the drug was administered as maintenance therapy after median of 2 (1-7) lines of anticancer treatment. Median follow-up time post olaparib progression was 13.0 months. Median post progression PFS and OS were 7.2 mo. and 20.0 mo. Results of Cox-regression analysis of PFS and OS are summarized in Table below. Taxanes- and/or bevacizumab-containing therapy was associated with better outcomes compared to other therapeutic options. Administration of anthracyclines (PLD or doxorubicin) had a detrimental impact on PFS and OS. Table: 541P

PFS OS
Factor HR (95% CI) p HR (95% CI) p
>2 prior lines .97 (.54-1.76) .345 .48 (.19-1.21) .124
Taxanes 0.47 (.25-.86) .014 0.26 (.07-.89) .032
Anthracyclines 5.7 (2.48-13.12) <.001* 2.57 (1.02-6.51) .045
Gemcitabine 1.28 (.64-2.56) .469 1.15 (.37-3.53) .797
Pt-agents 1.28 (.56-2.91) .546 .75 (.24-2.31) .627
Bevacizumab .54 (0.29-0.98) .043 .46 (.17-1.20) .114

*remained significant in multifactor analysis.

Conclusions

taxanes and bevacizumab are valuable therapeutic options for post-olaparib treatment. Anthracyclines may be associated with inferior outcomes in this setting. While optimal treatment for patients progressing after PARPi is unknown, our study provides some insights and hypothesis-generating data for further trials.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

A. Rumyantsev: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Biocad, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD, Merck. A. Tyulyandina: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, BIOCAD, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, MSD. E. Glazkova: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Biocad, AstraZeneca, R-Pharm, MSD, Pfizer. I. Pokataev: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Biocad, Sanofi, Roche, Eli Lilly. S. Tjulandin: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: RosPharmTech; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, Biocad, Eli Lilly, MSD.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.