Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 15

1079P - Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer with novel actionable oncogenic driver alterations

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 15

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Teresa Beninato

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S448-S554. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1064

Authors

T. Beninato1, M. Brambilla1, C.C. Pircher1, L. Mazzeo1, A. Rametta1, S. Manglaviti1, A. De Toma1, G. Galli1, A. Prelaj1, R. Ferrara1, C. Proto1, G. Lo Russo1, M. Ganzinelli1, R. Di Mauro1, A. Di Nucci1, M.C. Garassino2, P. Marchetti3, F.G.M. De Braud1, M. Occhipinti1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Dipartimento Di Oncologia Medica, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 - Milan/IT
  • 2 Department Of Medicine, University of Chicago Department of Medicine - Section of Hematology/Oncology, 60637-1470 - Chicago/US
  • 3 Oncologia E Oncologia Dermatologica, IRCCS Istituto Dermopatologico dell'Immacolata IDI, 00189 - Rome/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1079P

Background

Standard treatments for Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without common driver alterations include the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO) as single agents or in combination with platinum chemotherapy (CT-IO), according to PD-L1 expression. However, IO activity in patients (pts) with novel oncogenic drivers’ alterations is not well explored.

Methods

We analyzed data of pts with advanced NSCLC treated with IO or CT-IO in any line between January 2016 to January 2022. Clinical and pathological data were extracted from our Institutional database. Pts harboring novel drive alterations (m-cohort) such as MET exon 14 skipping mutations, BRAF mutations (V600E or non-V600E), RET rearrangements, HER2 point mutations/exon 20 insertions or uncommon EGFR mutations/EGFR exon 20 insertions, and wild type pts (wt-cohort) were considered eligible for the analyses. Median progression free survival (mPFS) was estimated through Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.

Results

We identified 64 pts for the m-cohort and 451 pts for the wt-cohort. With a median follow up of 33.8 months (m), mPFS was 4.73 m (0.95CI 3.93-5.85) overall and no statistical difference was observed between m-cohort and wt-cohort (mPFS 5.53 m (95%CI 4.73-6.97) vs 4.50 (95%CI 3.80-5.83), p 0.998). Moreover, mPFS was comparable across the different novel driver alteration’s subgroups. Considering only first line treatments, in m-cohort and wt-cohort respectively, 23 (56%) and 136 (62%) pts received IO while 18 (44%) and 85 (38%) were treated with CT-IO. Statistically significant differences were observed only for IO treatment in the PD-L1>50% group (mPFS 4.33 m (95%CI 1.97-NA) for m-cohort vs 7.60 m (95%CI 4.13-30.5) for wt-cohort, p 0.0179), whereas in the CT-IO arm there were no differences among the two groups (mPFS 6.77 m(95%CI5.17-NA) for m-cohort vs 7.03 m (95%CI 5.73-8.43) for wt-cohort, p 0.567).

Conclusions

IO based treatments are not detrimental for pts harboring novel driver alterations per se. Anyway, in this particular subset of patients, IO single agent may not be effective enough and combination treatment with chemotherapy might be recommended regardless of PD-L1 expression.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

A. Prelaj: Financial Interests, Personal, Training: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel accommodation: Italfarma. R. Ferrara: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BeiGene, MSD. C. Proto: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Meyer Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Principal Investigator: Janssen, Pfizer, Lilly, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Roche, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca. G. Lo Russo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS, Italfarmaco, Roche, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Sanofi. M.C. Garassino: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, MSD, International GmbH, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Italia S.p.A., Celgene, Eli lilly, Ignyta, Incyte, Inivata, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. F.G.M. De Braud: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Ignyta, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Octimet Oncology, Incyte, Teofarma, Pierre Fabre, Roche, EMD Serono, Sanofi, NMS Nerviano Medical Science, Pharm Research Associated (U.K.) Ltd; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Roche, MSD, Ignyta, Bayer, ACCMED, Dephaforum S.r.l., Nadirex, Merck, Biotechspert Ltd, PriME Oncology, Pfizer, Servier, Celgene, Tesaro, Loco Oncology Inc, Sanofy, Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology; Financial Interests, Institutional, Principal Investigator: Novartis, Roche, BMS, Celgene, Incyte, NMS, Merck KGAA, Pfizer, Tesaro, MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.