Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 14

1042P - Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with recombinant human endostatin first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 14

Topics

Targeted Therapy;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Hongxiang Huang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S448-S554. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1064

Authors

H. Huang1, S. Fu2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 330006 - Nanchang/CN
  • 2 Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 330006 - Nanchang/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1042P

Background

Clinical evidences of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus antiangiogenic drugs as the first-line therapy for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were still insufficient, which greatly limited the application of evidence-based medicine in clinic. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in combination with recombinant human endostatin (Rh-endostatin) and chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC.

Methods

Clinical data of 100 patients with NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 58 patients in the experimental group (IEC group) were treated with PD-1 inhibitors combined with Rh-endostatin and chemotherapy, and 42 patients treated with Rh-endostatin and chemotherapy were in the control group (EC group). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary end points included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events were compared between the IEC group and EC group.

Results

The IEC group showed significantly improved ORR (67.2% vs 42.9%, P = 0.015) and prolonged PFS (10.2 months vs 6.5 months, P < 0.001). The DCR and 1-year OS rate in the IEC group was higher than that in the EC group, while the difference was not statistically significant (98.3% vs 90.5%, P=0.193; 79.3% vs 76.2%, P=0.710). Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that treatment modality, brain metastasis and clinical stage might be independent risk factors for median PFS (mPFS). There were no significant differences in adverse events between two groups.

Conclusions

Our study showed the superiority of combination therapy of PD-1 inhibitors combined with Rh-endostatin as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC in terms of ORR and PFS, which represented a promising treatment modality for this population.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Hongxiang Huang.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.