Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 10

690P - Early response to leukocyte interleukin Injection (LI) immunotherapy extends overall survival (OS) in locally advanced primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head & neck (SCCHN): The IT-MATTERS study

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 10

Topics

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

Philip Lavin

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S295-S322. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1056

Authors

P. Lavin1, E. Talor2, D. Markovic3, J. Cipriano2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, Boston Biostatistics Research Foundation, 01702 - Framingham/US
  • 2 Oncology, CEL-SCI Corporation, 22182 - Vienna/US
  • 3 Medical Affairs, Ergomed d.o.o. Beograd, 11070 - Belgrade/RS

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 690P

Background

Our phase 3 study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01265849) evaluated a 3-week pre-surgery administration of an investigational natural cytokine complex biologic (LI) with/without CIZ (low dose cyclophosphamide), indomethacin, and zinc in oral and soft-palate SCCHN + standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone.

Methods

Early response (ER) pre-surgery was evaluated by RECIST for all subjects (923 ITT; 380 Low Risk [LR] ITT) in addition to OS at 5-yrs. Subjects were randomized 3:1:3 to treatment arms LI (+/- CIZ) + SOC or to Control (SOC alone). LI was administered daily for 3-weeks (x5/wk) before surgery. Overall median follow-up was 4.7 years.

Results

There were 45 ERs and 462 deaths (50.1%). ERs were most common in LR and only seen in the two LI treated groups, but never seen in SOC alone; death rates fell significantly for ERs vs non-responders. ER confirms OS advantage: LR LI+CIZ+SOC exhibited 306% OS prolongation for 15.2% ERs. Assuming no OS prolongation for the remaining 84.8%, this equates to a 46.5% OS gain corresponding to a 0.68 HZR (1/1.465) as observed for the LR LI+CIZ+SOC group. There was a 46-month median OS advantage for LR LI+CIZ+SOC vs LR SOC. Table: 690P

Treatment Group Site Determined Risk Classification
Early Response Rate
Low Risk High Risk (HR) Unclassified Totals
LI+CIZ+SOC 15.2% 3.5% 2.7% 8.1%
LI+SOC 18.5% 4.3% 0% 9.7%
Combined LI 16.0% 3.7% 2.1% 8.5%
SOC 0% 0% 0% 0%
2-sided Fisher Exact Test P<0.0001 P=0.0062 NS P<0.0001
Death Rate
Response Outcome Combined LI LR Combined LI LR LI+CIZ+SOC
Responders 22.2% 17.6% 12.5%
Non-responders 54.1% 42.5% 40.7%
2-sided Fisher Exact Test P<0.0001 P=0.0068 P=0.01
Hazard Ratio (HZR)
Combined LI LR Combined LI LR LI+CIZ+SOC
HZR 0.301 0.348 0.246
2-sided 95% CI 0.16, 0.566 0.152, 0.801 0.077, 0.787
2-sided Wald Test P<0.0001 P=0.0067 P=0.01

Conclusions

ER was only observed for the LI treatments. Multiple ERs were observed; LR (n=34), HR (n=10), and 1 subject without risk classification. ER from LI treatment is not only prognostic but also predicts a most favorable OS outcome.

Clinical trial identification

Protocol: CS001P3, 30June2010, NCT01265849.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

CEL-SCI Corporation.

Funding

CEL-SCI Corporation.

Disclosure

P. Lavin: Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role, Including Funding: CEL-SCI. E. Talor: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Full or part-time Employment, Including Stocks/Shares: CEL-SCI. D. Markovic: Institutional: CEL-SCI. J. Cipriano: Financial Interests, Personal, Officer, Including Stocks/Shares: CEL-SCI.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.