Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 15

1053P - Early prediction of non-response to immunotherapy by a combined serum tumor marker model in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 15

Topics

Laboratory Diagnostics;  Response Evaluation (RECIST Criteria);  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Milou Schuurbiers

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S448-S554. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1064

Authors

M. Schuurbiers1, F. van Delft2, H. Koffijberg2, S. Burgers3, M. IJzerman2, H. Van Rossum4, M. van den Heuvel1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA - Nijmegen/NL
  • 2 Health Technology & Services Research Department, University of Twente, NL-7500 AE - Enschede/NL
  • 3 Thoracic Oncology Department, NKI-AVL - Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX - Amsterdam/NL
  • 4 Department Of Laboratory Medicine, NKI-AVL - Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX - Amsterdam/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1053P

Background

Immunotherapy has provided a significant survival benefit in up to 50% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The ongoing struggle is to accurately predict which patients will benefit. Prediction of non-response (i.e. progressive disease despite receiving immunotherapy) could enable an early decision about treatment continuation. Since serum tumor markers (STM) are known to reflect tumor mass, sequentially measured STM may provide predictive information. The aim of this study is to externally validate a previously developed STM model to predict non-response to immunotherapy soon after initiation.

Methods

In a cohort of 412 metastatic NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy, STM were measured during the first six weeks of treatment. Non-response was defined as progressive disease on chest CT scan using RECIST criteria, clinical progressive disease, or death within six months after treatment initiation. Nine prediction methods with different combinations of STM were compared. At a specificity of 95%, the boosting model including Cyfra, CEA and NSE provided the most robust performance with a sensitivity of 74% in the training cohort and 58% in the test cohort. This model was validated in an external validation cohort of 208 metastatic NSCLC patients (Table). Table: 1053P

Training cohort (n= 412) Validation cohort (n= 208)
Year of inclusion 2014-2018 2019-2021
Mean age in years 63 64
Treatment
Mono immunotherapy 412 (100%) 100 (48%)
Immuno-chemotherapy 0 (0%) 108 (52%)
Lines of therapy prior to immunotherapy
0 8 (2%) 124 (60%)
1 317 (77%) 49 (24%)
≥2 87 (21%) 34 (16%)
Non-response after 6 months (%) 281 (68%) 92 (44%)

Results

In the external validation cohort, the Cyfra, CEA and NSE boosting model accurately predicted non-response in 46% of patients after six weeks of immunotherapy while maintaining a specificity of 92%. False positive patients could partially be explained by renal impairment or simultaneous other malignancies.

Conclusions

After six weeks of immunotherapy, our STM model is able to accurately predict non-response in nearly half of patients who will not benefit after six months. This model creates an early window of opportunity to switch to a possibly more effective second line treatment, lowering immune-related toxicity and reducing treatment costs.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.