Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 03

852P - Does sex affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors? A national Danish melanoma study

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 03

Topics

Clinical Research;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Melanoma

Presenters

Søren Petersen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S356-S409. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1059

Authors

S.K. Petersen1, H. Schmidt2, E. Ellebæk3, C.A. Haslund4, C.R. Hansen5, L. Bastholt1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 - Odense/DK
  • 2 Department Of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 - Aarhus/DK
  • 3 Department Of Oncology, National Center For Cancer Immune Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, 2730 - Herlev/DK
  • 4 Department Of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000 - Aalborg/DK
  • 5 Laboratory Of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, 5000 - Odense/DK

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 852P

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are current standard in treating metastatic melanoma. In melanoma, males are known to have a poorer prognosis compared to females. However, metanalysis have shown conflicting results regarding differences in ICI efficacy between females and males. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of ICI in a real-world Danish metastatic melanoma population according to sex. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and melanoma specific survival (MSS).

Methods

All patients treated with ICI (anti-PD-1 and/or anti-CTLA4) for metastatic melanoma in Denmark between 2011-2021 were identified in the Danish metastatic melanoma database. Only patients receiving ICI as first-line treatment were included. Baseline characteristics were evaluated according to ICI treatment for; age, ECOG performance status, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), M-stage, BRAF status, the origin of melanoma (cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma), and granulocytes. Parameters for multivariate analysis were selected backwards, with a cutoff at 0.10.

Results

1461 patients; 573 females and 888 males were identified. Baseline characteristics were significantly unbalanced between sex. A higher frequency of BRAF mutation and a lower age was found for females, however, also elevated LDH and advanced M stage. The median follow-up time for PFS was 51 months (95% CI 48-55). Multivariate analysis showed sex as a significant factor of efficacy with improved PFS for females (HR 1.16 (1.02-1.33), p=0.03). Females showed significantly better OS with a five-year survival of 46% (41%-51%) for females and 38% (34%-42%) for males. Multivariate analysis reinforced this significance with HR 1.29 (1.09-1.52). Five-year MSS rates were 49% (95% CI 44%-54%) for female and 45% (40%-49%) for male. Multivariate analysis showed significantly better MSS for females (1.20 (1.01-1.43), p=0.04).

Conclusions

This study represents a complete, national dataset of ICI-treated metastatic melanoma patients. Baseline characteristics were unbalanced between sexes. Despite adjustments for clinical, validated prognostic factors, sex remains an independent prognostic factor for PFS, OS, and MSS in this real-world cohort.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Danish metastatic melanoma database (DAMMED).

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.