Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 14

773P - Differences between hyperprogressive disease and progressive disease in patients receiving immunotherapy

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 14

Topics

Response Evaluation (RECIST Criteria);  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Hasan Yildirim

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S331-S355. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1058

Authors

H.C. Yildirim1, D.C.C. Guven2, O.H. Aktepe1, F. Yilmaz3, B.Y. Aktas2, G. Guner1, O. Dizdar4, S. Aksoy3, M. Erman5, S. Yalcin3, S. Kilickap6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital, 06230 - Ankara/TR
  • 2 Department Of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Oncology Hospital, 06230 - Ankara/TR
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, Hacettepe University - Faculty of Medicine, 06100 - Ankara/TR
  • 4 Preventive Oncology Dept, Hacettepe University - Faculty of Medicine, 06100 - Ankara/TR
  • 5 Medical Oncology Department, Hacettepe University, 06100 - Ankara/TR
  • 6 Department Of Medical Oncology, Istinye University Faculty of Medicine, 06100 - Istanbul/TR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 773P

Background

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became a vital part of cancer care, many patients do not respond to treatment. In this group, a few of the patients with a hyperprogressive disease (HPD) have shorter overall survival (OS) compared with those having a progressive disease (PD). Therefore, biomarkers are needed to differentiate HPD and PD.

Methods

Ninety-five patients treated with ICIs with progression according to response evaluation criteria ın solid tumors criteria in the first control imaging were included. HPD was defined according to Russo's work. The PILE scoring system, which includes pan-immune-inflammation value, lactate dehydrogenase, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS, was followed. The relationship between PILE score and HPD was analyzed.

Results

The median OS of all cohorts was 11.18 months. The patients in the HPD group had decreased OS (4.77 vs. 13.94 months, p<0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (1.89 vs. 3.16 months, p<0.001) compared with those in the PD group. The risk of HPD was higher than the risk of PD in patients with a high PILE score (p=0.001).

Conclusions

In this study, we showed that patients treated with ICI with a higher PILE score are at greater risk for HPD. The PILE score may be a biomarker to differentiate HPD from PD.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Hacettepe University.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.