Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 02

233P - Decision-making criteria for the choice of 1st line CDK4/6-inhibitor therapy for HR+/Her2- breast cancer in Germany: DECISIONext

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 02

Topics

Clinical Research;  Endocrine Therapy;  Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer;  Gynaecological Malignancies

Presenters

Dominique Finas

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S88-S121. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1040

Authors

D. Finas

Author affiliations

  • Dept. Gynaecology And Obstetrics, Gemeinschaftskrankrankenhaus Havelhöhe, 14089 - Berlin/DE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 233P

Background

German AGO breast recommendations 2021 propose endocrine-based therapy as the 1st therapy option for HR+, MBC, if there is no threat of organ failure. Since 2016, CDK4/6i + endocrine therapy (ET) is an option for 1st L therapy. This data collection intends to show which therapy decisions are made and why in different patient groups with 1st L MBC. Subsequent therapy may require molecular tumor characterization. How often molecular testing is done with MBC is largely unknown.

Methods

Retrospective data collection was carried out at 40 gynaeco-/oncological centers in Germany. Data of 391 pts with HR+/HER2- MBC were anonymously recorded, treated from 01.01. to 30.06.2021 for 1st L therapy. Questions to be answered are:

- To what extent do different patient characteristics, previous treatment and course of tumor influence the choice of 1st L therapy?.

- Factors that influenced therapy decision?.

- Frequency of molecular testing in met. situation and target parameters?.

Results

Of 391 pts, 17.4% were pre- and 82.5% postmenopausal. 40.4% of the pts had de novo disease, 59.6% had (neo)adjuvant pretreatment, 56.7% had chemo. 36.5% of the (neo)adjuvant treated pts relapsed during ongoing adjuvant therapy, another 8.2% within 1 y after completion of adjuvant therapy. Of these endocrine resistant pts, treatment with CDK4/6i was not more frequent with fulvestrant than with AI. In 32.7% of the pts, a molecular test was carried out in the met. situation: 9.5% for PIK3CAm, 21% for BRCAm. As 1st L therapy in the met. situation, 86.2% received a CDK4/6i, 6.6% chemo and 6.4% endocrine monotherapy. Pts on endocrine monotherapy are older and more likely to have solitary bone mets. Pts receiving 1st L chemotherapy are more likely to have lung and liver mets., these are not more likely to be symptomatic. Most common reported reasons for choosing CDK4/6i are "long experience with the substance" (48.8%) and "data situation" (45.5%). Endocrine resistance played a role in CDK4/6i selection in only 8% of pts.

Conclusions

Most pts with HR+/Her2- MBC receive the recommended therapy with CDK4/6i and ET. Molecular testing should be promoted to offer personalized therapy. Future therapy decision making should be more oriented to published data.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Novartis.

Funding

Novartis.

Disclosure

D. Finas: Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Roche, MSD.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.