Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 11

1698P - Correlation between sex steroid hormone receptors expression in prostate cancer (PCa)

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 11

Topics

Cancer Biology;  Pathology/Molecular Biology;  Translational Research;  Molecular Oncology

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Marina Puchinskaya

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S772-S784. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1079

Authors

M. Puchinskaya

Author affiliations

  • Out-patient Department, Minsk City Clinical Oncologic Centre, 220013 - Minsk/BY

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1698P

Background

PCa is well known to be an androgen-dependent disease. However, estrogens and estrogen receptors alpha and beta (ERα and ERβ) also play an important role in PCa progression. All types of receptors share similar structure and can be activated by same ligands. As so, relative amounts of all receptor types may be important in predicting overall response to therapy, including androgen deprivation. We aimed to assess possible correlations between ERα, ERβ and androgen receptor (AR) expression in clinical PCa samples.

Methods

A training cohort of 31 radical prostatectomy samples was analyzed. Expression was assessed using double immunofluorescence. Primary antibodies used were mouse monoclonal to AR and ERα, rabbit polyclonal to ERβ. Secondary antibodies were labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 and 555 dyes. 3-15 high power fields (HPF, x40) per case were analyzed. Expression was assessed semiquantitatively (0-3 scores) based on the proportion of stained cells and staining intensity with multiplying the resulting numbers to get total staining score (TSS) for each HPF. Mean TSS was then calculated for each case. ERα and ERβ were stained on the same section and assessed in the same HPF, while AR expression was assessed based on per case TSS.

Results

Mean TSS for ERα was 1.28 and 0.40, ERβ – 3.65 and 2.98 in stroma and epithelium, correspondingly and AR 3.04. TSS for stromal and epithelial ERα expression were not correlated, while a strong correlation was seen for ERβ (rSpearman=0.87). When assessing ER subtypes in stroma, there was correlation in stroma (rSpearman=0.49), but not epithelium. As AR staining in stroma was very similar in all cases, only epithelial AR was assessed. No significant correlations were found between epithelial AR with ER subtypes in stroma or epithelium. Direct assessment of AR and ER coexpression was not performed.

Conclusions

Both ER subtypes were more expressed in stroma than epithelium, but expression was lower than that for epithelial AR. Era and ERb levels were correlated in stroma, possibly showing a role for paracrine regulation of PCa growth. AR expression was not significantly correlated with ER subtypes in our cohort. A study with more cases is ongoing to better define possible links between receptors levels and their possible cumulative role in PCa.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

M. Puchinskaya.

Funding

Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research, Grants No. M14M-143, M19M-123.

Disclosure

M. Puchinskaya: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.