Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 04

956P - Computed tomography and radiation dose images-based deep-learning model for predicting radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients after radiation therapy: A pilot study with external validation

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 04

Topics

Radiation Oncology

Tumour Site

Presenters

Zhen Zhang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S438-S447. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1063

Authors

Z. Zhang1, L. Wee2, A. Dekker2, L. Zhao3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Radiation Oncology, Maastro Clinic, 6229 ET - Maastricht/NL
  • 2 Department Of Radiation Oncology (maastro), Grow-school For Oncology And Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands., Maastro Clinic, 6229 ET - Maastricht/NL
  • 3 Department Of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Cancer Hospital, 300060 - Tianjin/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 956P

Background

The objective of this study is to use a deep learning approach to develop a model that combines CT and dose images to predict the occurrence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in lung cancer patients who received radical (chemo)radiotherapy.

Methods

CT images, radiation dose images and clinical parameters were obtained from 314 retrospectively-collected patients (training set) and 35 prospectively-collected patients (test-set-1) diagnosed with lung cancer between 2013 and 2019. Another 153 (60Gy group, test-set-2) and 89 (74Gy group, test-set-3) patients from the clinical trial RTOG 0617 were used for external validation. A ResNet architecture was applied as the backbone to develop a prediction model that incorporates CT and dose images. The CT and dose weights were adjusted to accommodate cohorts with different clinical settings or dose delivery patterns. The test sets were used to evaluate the model. Visual interpretation was implemented using a gradient-weighted class activation map (grad-CAM) to observe the area of model attention during the prediction process. To improve the ease of use of the model, ready-to-use online software was developed.

Results

The discriminative ability of the model was AUC 0.83, Accuracy 0.82, Sensitivity 0.70, Specificity 0.88 for test-set-1, AUC 0.55 for test-set-2, and AUC 0.63 for test-set-3. After adjusting the model with 40 patients from test-set-2 and test-set-3, the discriminatory power of test sets 2 and 3 improved to AUC 0.65 and AUC 0.70, respectively. Grad-CAM showed the regions of interest to the model that contribute to the prediction of RP. Table: 956P

Performance of proposed algorithm in the test sets

Dataset AUC Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity
Test-set-1 0.834 (0.823- 0.906) 0.824 (0.746- 0.812) 0.703 (0.670 -0.770) 0.875 (0.832-0.894)
Test-set-2 0.552 (0.466-0.688) 0.695 (0.572-0.818) 0.413 (0.391-0.523) 0.691 (0.612-0.837)
Test-set-3 0.627 (0.531-0.724) 0.664 (0.600-0.728) 0.595 (0.456-0.735) 0.682 (0.612-0.753)
Test-set-2* 0.650 (0.535-0.766) 0.763 (0.627-0.907) 0.578 (0.483-0.832) 0.698 (0.662-0.975)
Test-set-3* 0.700 (0.625-0.762) 0.712 (0.634-0.831) 0.615 (0.563-0.855) 0.733 (0.671-0.950)

∗the asterisk indicates that the coefficients of CT and RD for this model are adjusted for each set of 40 patients.

Conclusions

A novel deep learning approach combining CT and dose images can effectively and accurately predict the occurrence of RP.

Clinical trial identification

This manuscript was prepared using data from Datasets [RTOG-0617] from the NCTN/NCORP Data Archive of the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI’s) National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN). Data were originally collected from clinical trial NCT number [NCT00533949] [RTOG-0617]. All analyses and conclusions in this manuscript are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the clinical trial investigators, the NCTN, the NCORP or the NCI.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.