Abstract 763P
Background
The intrinsic and acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a fact. We propose an immune-metabolic signature (IMMETCOLS sig.) that distributes patients (pts) across 11 tumors in 3 clusters (IMC1-3); IMC1 has more immune-suppressive score, despite higher PD1 and PD-L1 expression and IMC3, more metabolic flexibility in terms of glycolysis/mitochondrial respiration capacities. We hypothesize that our sig. in combination with TcellinfGEP and tumor mutational burden (TMB) can better identify pts for ICI.
Methods
We analyzed 303 samples treated with pembrolizumab: melanoma (89), head & neck carcinoma (109) and pan-tumor (105) in 4 Keynote studies (KN001/006/012/028). 21 of our 38-gene IMMETCOLS sig. (mostly upregulated in IMC1) were available on the Nanostring CodeSet, and we evaluated the impact of this 21 gene IMMETCOLS and TcellinfGEP sig. We evaluated both by testing for associations with best overall response (BOR) or/and progression free survival (PFS) using continuous sig. scores and evaluating response rates in quadrants defined by cut-offs (TcellinfGEP 1st and IMMETCOLS 2nd tertile). TcellinfGEP and IMMETCOLS scores were calculated as a weighted sum of normalized expression values.
Results
The IMMETCOLS sig. showed a positive correlation to TcellinfGEP (rs 0.667) but not with TMB (rs 0.085). Only 1% of patients were in the TcellinfGEP low/IMMETCOLS high group, suggesting that mitochondrial metabolism constitutes the main metabolic pathways in pts with TcellinfGEP low sig. The results of joint modeling with the TcellinfGEP, a process by which sensitizing dimensions of IMMETCOLS is detrended from the test of association, showed a non-statistically significant trend towards the hypothesized negative association of IMMETCOLS to BOR and PFS.
Conclusions
IMMETCOLS score has a substantial correlation with TcellinfGEP sig., but contain information negatively associated with clinical outcome that is orthogonal to the TcellinfGEP that may be associated with resistance. We suggest, that blocking mitochondrial metabolism/electron transport chain in TcellinfGEP low pts and also in refractory to ICI Tcellinf GEP high pts would be a promising strategy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Nebozhyn: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Merck. I. Cirrincione: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD. P. Morales: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD. J. Lunceford: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.