Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 15

1110P - Clinical outcomes for EGFR/HER2 exon 20 insertion-mutated NSCLC

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 15

Topics

Clinical Research;  Targeted Therapy;  Molecular Oncology

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Kelly Li

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S448-S554. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1064

Authors

K. Li1, I. Bosdet2, S. Yip2, C. Ho1, J. Laskin1, B. Melosky1, Y. Wang1, S. Sun1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency - Vancouver, V5Z 4E6 - Vancouver/CA
  • 2 Cancer Genetics Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency - Vancouver, V5Z 4E6 - Vancouver/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1110P

Background

EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins) are rare in NSCLC, with poor prognosis and few targeted therapy options. There are limited real-world data for patients (pts) with these uncommon mutations. We report clinicopathologic features and outcomes for 131 pts with ex20ins NSCLC across British Columbia, Canada.

Methods

NSCLC pts who had tumour testing Jan 1, 2016-Dec 31, 2021 (n=7233) were identified via the provincial database. Pts with ex20ins in EGFR or HER2 were included. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank testing.

Results

Of 131 pts (84 EGFR, 47 HER2), 46% were Asian, 60% female, 71% never/light smokers (Table). 85% were metastatic (met). For met EGFR ex20ins pts (n=71), median overall survival (mOS) was 7.1 months (mos). 39/71 (55%) had systemic therapy (ST); 20/39 (51%) received ex20ins-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), (eg. poziotinib, mobocertinib, or afatinib). mOS was 18.6 mos for pts receiving any ST vs 2.6 mos for pts who did not (p<0.001). mOS was similar for pts treated with ex20ins TKI vs other (18.6 vs 15.9 mos, p=0.463). In 1st-line, mPFS was 7.1 mos for all pts; mPFS was 4.1 vs. 7.4 mos for TKI-treated pts vs other (p=0.744). Gr 3 toxicity was 15.4% (6/39) for all ST pts, and 20% (4/20) for TKI pts. For met HER2 ex20ins pts (n=41), mOS was 7.3 mos. 25/41 (61%) pts had ST; 11/25 (44%) received ex20ins-specific TKI. mOS was 9 mos for pts who received any ST vs 4.9 mos for pts who did not (P=0.015). mOS was 23.0 mos for pts treated with ex20ins TKI vs 5.6 mos for pts who were not (P=0.019). In the 1L setting mPFS was 4.5 mos for all pts who had ST; mPFS was 5.4 vs. 2.1 mos for pts who had TKI vs other (P=0.343). Gr 3 toxicity was 16% (4/25) for all ST pts, and 9% (1/11) for TKI pts. Table: 1110P

EGFR (n=84) HER2 (n=47)
Age (y), median (range) 66 (37-87) 67 (27-97)
Sex, n (%)
M 33 (39) 20 (43)
F 51 (61) 27 (57)
Ethnicity, n (%)
Asian 41 (49) 19 (40)
Non-Asian 43 (51) 28 (60)
Smoking (pack years), n (%)
Never 47 (56) 26 (55)
Light ( 16 (19) 4 (9)
Heavy (>10) 21 (25) 15 (32)
Unknown 0 (0) 2 (4)
Brain mets, n (%) 31 (37) 12 (26)
Palliative systemic therapy (ST), n (%)
Total 39 (46) 25 (53)
No. lines. Median (range) 1 (0-5) 1 (0-5)
Ex20ins TKI 20 (24) 11 (23)
Immunotherapy 15 (19) 17 (36)
Treatment outcomes
OS median (range) mos
All pts 7.1 (0.9-83.2) 7.3 (0.5-56.7)
ST 18.6 (3.7-83.2) 9.0 (1.5-56.7)
No ST 2.6 (0.9-26.4) 4.9 (0.5-14.6)
ex20ins TKI 18.6 (3.7-28.8) 23.0 (3.3-56.7)
Other ST 15.9 (4.7-83.2) 5.6 (1.5-17.1)

Conclusions

In this large, population-based retrospective review of EGFR and HER2 ex20ins NSCLC pts, there was improvement in survival for met pts who received any ST vs. those who did not. Among HER2 ex20 pts who received ST, overall survival was significantly better for those who received ex20ins-specific TKIs.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding

Disclosure

S. Yip: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Incyte, Roche. C. Ho: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, EMD Serono, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: Roche, AstraZeneca, EMD Serono. J. Laskin: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Jazz, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche. B. Melosky: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck, BMS, Novartis, Janzen, Sanofi. Y. Wang: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Takeda; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AZ. S. Sun: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.