Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 19

CN46 - Catheter-related venous thrombosis: Experience with blue advance peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in a day hospital during the pandemic

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 19

Presenters

Ferran Losa

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S820-S826. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1045

Authors

F. Losa1, M. Mancha1, N. Moragriega1, A. Perez1, A. Manzana1, A. Rios1, A. Aranda2, E. Cabezudo2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Hospital de Sant Joan Despi Moisès Broggi, 8970 - Sant Joan Despí/ES
  • 2 Hematology, Hospital de Sant Joan Despi Moisès Broggi, 8970 - Sant Joan Despí/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract CN46

Background

The PICC in our Day Hospital (DH) has become the central line of choice for the therapeutic management of oncological and hematological patients when the duration does not exceed 6 months. The impact of COVID-19 in these patients led to an increase in risk factors for the occurrence of venous thrombosis (VT) and catheter-related venous thrombosis (CRVT), forcing admission-like immobility, intensification of supportive treatment with granulocyte colony growth factors (G-CSF) and a higher number of PICC insertions in metastatic patients. Given these circumstances, it was decided to use the Blue Advance PICC with antithrombogenic coverage. The objective was record the incidence of symptomatic CRVT related to Blue Advance PICC in oncological and hematological patients in active treatment, as well as the incidence of other complications and causes of withdrawal.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was performed, in a consecutive series of patients from November 2019 to June 2021. All catheters were inserted in DH for oncospecific treatment, using PICC Blue Advance Teleflex Medical®, 4'5Fr, 1 lumen, by ultrasound-guided puncture and tip confirmation by fluoroscopy. Variables recorded: demographic data, diagnosis and stage, treatment administered, date of insertion and removal, vein diameter, cause of removal and complications.

Results

A total of 295 blue PICC were analyzed, with a total length of stay of 46,150 days and a mean of 156 days per catheter. Ninety-eight percent of the PICCs were placed at the first attempt, and the predominant access was the basilic and brachial veins, with diameter between 2.9-5.6mm. There were 9 cases of symptomatic CRVT (3%, 0.19/1000 catheter days), confirmed by Echo-Doppler, which did not require catheter removal and treatment was completed. Six CRVT were diagnosed between the first and third week of insertion in female patients, with cytostatic Adriamycin and G-CSF. The main cause of withdrawal was end of treatment in 94.9%.

Conclusions

The use of the antithrombogenic Blue Advance PICC during the pandemic period, despite the increase in risk factors, kept the incidence rate of symptomatic CRVT unchanged in our historical pre-COVID cohort.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.