Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 05

1592P - Cardiovascular toxicity in patients treated with a PARP inhibitor for solid tumors: A meta-analysis

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 05

Presenters

Maria Chiara Cannizzaro

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S713-S742. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1075

Authors

M.C. Cannizzaro1, C. Ciccarese2, A. Palazzo2, M. Pasqualoni1, L. Pontolillo1, R. Iacovelli2, E. Bria1, G. Tortora1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Unit - Comprehensive Cancer Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 - Rome/IT
  • 2 Medical Oncology Unit - Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 - Rome/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1592P

Background

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have changed the treatment landscape of several types of solid tumors in the last years, but little is known about their cardiovascular (CV) safety profile. This meta-analysis aimed at assessing the incidence and relative risk (RR) of PARPi-related cardiovascular toxicity (CVT) and hypertension (HTN).

Methods

Prospective studies were identified by searching the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library and ASCO Meeting abstracts. Data extraction was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Combined RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects methods, depending on studies heterogeneity. RevMan software for meta-analysis (v.5.2.3) was used to perform statistical analyses.

Results

Twenty-two studies were selected for the analysis of CVT, with a total of 7078 patients. The incidence of any grade and high-grade CVT was 6.5% and 2.4% with PARPi, respectively, compared to 3.9% and 1.6% in the controls. Treatment with a PARPi significantly increased the risk of any grade CVT (fixed-effects, RR=1.80, 95% CI 1.42–2.27; p<0.00001) and of high-grade CVT (fixed-effects, RR=1.62, 95% CI 1.15–2.28; p=0.006) compared to controls. Similarly, when considering only those studies testing a PARPi monotherapy in the experimental arms, the risk of CVT of any grade (RR=4.49, p=0.008) and high-grade (RR=3.16, p=0.006) was significantly higher compared to controls. As concern HTN, twenty-one studies were selected, with a total of 8365 patients. The incidence of HTN of any grade and high-grade was 19.2% and 4.7% with PARPi therapies, respectively, compared to 13.7% and 3.3% in the controls. Treatment with a PARPi significantly increased the risk of HTN of any grade compared to controls (random-effects, RR=1.77, 95% CI 1.07–2.92; p=0.03), but not of high-grade (RR=1.61, 95% CI 0.89–2.89; p=0.11). However, PARPi monotherapy was associated with a higher risk of HTN of high-grade (RR=2.33; p =0.0005), but not of any grade (RR 4.30, p =0.07).

Conclusions

PARPi significantly increase the risk of developing CVT and HTN. Therefore, clinicians should take into account patient's CV comorbidities and accurately monitor, early recognize and manage treatment-related CV complications.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.