Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 02

199P - Breast cancer overdiagnosis in England, 1995-2019

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 02

Topics

Secondary Prevention/Screening

Tumour Site

Presenters

Philippe Autier

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S55-S84. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1038

Authors

P. Autier1, M. Bota2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Epidemiology, International Prevention Research Institute, 69006 - Lyon/FR
  • 2 Biostatistics, IPRI, 69570 - Dardilly/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 199P

Background

Cancer overdiagnosis is the detection by screening of asymptomatic subjects of a cancer that would not be life-threatening during subject lifetime. Most studies that have evaluated overdiagnosis of screening mammography in general populations were based on time trend projections or on statistical models using unverified assumptions. Since 1988, the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBCSP) in England invites every three years women aged 50 to 65 (1988-2001), and 50 to 70 (2002-2019) years to screening mammography. This study estimates the excess in situ and invasive breast cancers (II-BC) in the NHSBCSP using a new approach based on real-world data on screening mammography activities in England.

Methods

Data from two publicly available sources were used: the breast cancer incidence data in England from the Office of National Statistics and the annual reports on the NHSBCSP from 1995 to 2019. The first source provided numbers of II-BC diagnosed each year in 5-year age groups of women. The second source provided (1) the number of resident women eligible for screening who had at least one screen the last three years, (2) the numbers of women invited to screening, and (3) the numbers of II-BC found at screening by 5-year age group. For each year, interval II-BC were estimated using interval II-BC rates reported in the literature on the NHSBCSP. Using these data, excess number of II-BC among women participating to screening were estimated.

Results

Incidence rates of screen-detected and of interval breast II-BC per 100,000 women participating to screening ranged from 313 in 1995 to 403 in 2019. Incidence rates among women not participating to screening ranged from 240 in 1995 to 314 in 2019. From 1995 to 2019, compared to women not participating to screening, there was a median 24% (IQR: 20%-28%) excess II-BC among women participating to screening. These excess II-BC represented 33% of all screen-detected cancers.

Conclusions

A novel approach based on real-world data showed that the NHSBCSP is associated with an excess number of II-BC that amounts to one quarter of all II-BC cancers found among participating women. Probably that most of this II-BC excess would not be diagnosed in the absence of screening.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Philippe Autier.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.