Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 15

1107P - BRAF mutations and fusions in a real-world cohort of NSCLC patients

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 15

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Jiaxin Niu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S448-S554. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1064

Authors

J.J. Niu1, E. Mauer2, A. Barrett2, A. Ashok2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Dept., Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center - Main Campus, 85234 - Gilbert/US
  • 2 Tempus, Tempus Labs, Inc., 60654 - Chicago/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1107P

Background

BRAF V600E (class I) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well characterized. However, less is known about other classes of BRAF mutations or BRAF fusions in this population. Previous studies have suggested that different classes of BRAF mutations may have varied clinical implications, motivating further study to guide therapeutic options in clinical practice. In this work, we set out to characterize the class of BRAF and co-occurring mutations as well as BRAF fusions in a real-world NSCLC cohort using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed de-identified records from 6,511 patients with NSCLC that underwent CGP with the Tempus xT assay (DNA-seq of 648 genes at 500x coverage, and full transcriptome RNA-seq for a subset of patients). BRAF mutations were classified based on published literature (PMID: 33019809).

Results

We identified 322/6,511 (4.9%) patients with pathogenic BRAF alterations. The cohort of 322 BRAF-mutant patients consisted of 87 class I patients (27.0%), 82 class II patients (25.5%), 83 class III patients (25.8%), and 70 other/unclassified (21.7%). Genomic analysis identified several significant differences in the co-mutational landscape of distinct BRAF classes including EGFR, KRAS, and NF1 (q<0.05). Pathogenic EGFR mutations were more prevalent in class I (20%) vs class II (6.1%) and class III (7.2%). By contrast, KRAS mutations were more prevalent in class II (13%) and class III (19%) compared to class I (3.4%). Similarly, NF1 mutations were more prevalent in class II (9.8%) and class III (12%) vs class I (2.3%). Notably, DNA and RNA gene fusion analysis identified 13 patients with reported pathogenic BRAF fusions; of these, 11/13 were only identified via RNA-seq.

Conclusions

DNA and RNA-seq analysis showed that BRAF Class II and Class III mutations are associated with distinct genomic characteristics as compared to Class I, such as more frequent concurrent RAS and NF1 mutations. BRAF fusions were also detected, predominantly via RNA sequencing.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

J.J. Niu: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, BeiGene, Takeda, Mirati Therapeutics, Immvira, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exact Sciences; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Onclive, Naveris. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.