Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 10

1378P - Biopsy-based basal-luminal subtyping classifier in high-risk prostate cancer: Analysis of the NRG Oncology/RTOG 9202, 9413, and 9902 randomized phase III trials

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 10

Topics

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Paul Nguyen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S616-S652. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1070

Authors

P. Nguyen1, V. Liu2, J.A. Proudfoot2, E. Davicioni2, Y. Liu2, A. Dal Pra3, D.E. Spratt4, H.M. Sandler5, J.A. Efstathiou6, C. Lawton7, J.P. Simko8, S. Rosenthal9, K. Zeitzer10, L. Mendez11, A. Hartford12, W. Hall13, A. Desai14, S. Pugh15, P.T. Tran16, F. Feng17

Author affiliations

  • 1 Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 02215 - Boston/US
  • 2 Urology, Veracyte, Inc., 92121 - San Diego/US
  • 3 Radiation Oncology Department, UH Health - University of Miami Health System - Miller School of Medicine, 33146 - Coral Gables/US
  • 4 Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University / University Hospitals, 44106 - Cleveland/US
  • 5 Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 90048 - Los Angeles/US
  • 6 Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 02114 - Boston/US
  • 7 Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison/US
  • 8 Pathology, UCSF Medical Center at Mission Bay, 94158 - San Francisco/US
  • 9 Radiation Oncology, CPMC - California Campus - Sutter Health, 94118 - San Francisco/US
  • 10 Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 10461 - Bronx/US
  • 11 Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program (LRCP) - London Health Science Center (LHSC), N6A 4L6 - London/CA
  • 12 Radiation Oncology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 03766 - Lebanon/US
  • 13 Radiation Oncology, Froedtert Hospital & Medical College of Wisconsin, 53226 - Milwaukee/US
  • 14 Radiation Oncology, Summa Health System, 44304 - Akron/US
  • 15 Statistics, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia/US
  • 16 Radiation Oncology, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, 21201 - Baltimore/US
  • 17 Radiation Oncology, UCSF - University of California San Francisco - Parnassus Campus, 94158 - San Francisco/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1378P

Background

Subtype differentiation in prostate cancer (PCa) has been shown to be prognostic and predictive of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) response in the postoperative setting. We sought to determine whether basal-luminal subtypes based on gene expression profiling of pretreatment biopsy samples would be predictive for the benefit of long- (LT; 24-28 months) vs short-term (ST; 4 months) ADT, hypothesizing that patients with basal tumors benefit more from longer term ADT.

Methods

Whole-transcriptome arrays of biopsy samples from patients enrolled in the NRG/RTOG 9202, 9413, and 9902 randomized phase III trials were analyzed. The prognostic and predictive ability of a 215 gene basal-luminal prostate subtyping classifier (PSC) was evaluated for biochemical failure (BF), distant metastasis (DM), metastasis-free survival (MFS), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall survival (OS) with multivariable Cox models (MVA). Event rates were estimated by the cumulative incidence method and compared with Gray’s or logrank tests.

Results

265 samples were analyzed (40% PSC basal, 60% luminal). In MVA, the PSC basal subtype had a worse prognosis compared to PSC luminal for MFS (HR [95% CI] 1.8 [1.3-2.5], p<0.001), PCSM (HR 2.8 [1.5-5.0], p<0.001), and OS (HR 1.8 [1.3-2.6], p<0.001). PCSM rates at 10 years were 26% (95% CI 17-35%) for basal vs 11% (6-15%) for luminal subtypes. A significant interaction between PSC and ADT duration was observed for BF (p=0.02) and PCSM (p=0.007). Similar but non-significant trends were observed for DM, MFS, and OS. Basal subtypes significantly benefitted from LT- vs STADT (10-year PCSM 5% [95% CI 0-11%] vs 42% [29-56%], p<0.001), while luminal outcomes did not differ by ADT duration (p=0.72).

Conclusions

Gene expression analysis of pretreatment biopsy samples from three NRG phase III trials of high-risk PCa suggests that basal-luminal subtyping is predictive for the benefit of LT- vs STADT. Patients with basal tumors benefitted from longer term ADT while those with luminal did not, supporting the hypothesis that basal-luminal subtyping from biopsy samples can help personalize ADT duration in high-risk PCa.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

NRG Oncology.

Funding

Veracyte, Inc., National Cancer Institute, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb & Takeda Pharmaceutical.

Disclosure

V. Liu, J.A. Proudfoot, E. Davicioni, Y. Liu: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Veracyte. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.