Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 03

310P - Bevacizumab in meningiomas: A monocentric experience

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 03

Topics

Tumour Site

Central Nervous System Malignancies

Presenters

Giulia Cerretti

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S122-S135. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1047

Authors

G. Cerretti1, A. Bosio2, M. Maccari2, M. Padovan1, M. Caccese1, V. Zagonel1, G. Lombardi1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 - Padova/IT
  • 2 Department Of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 - Padova/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 310P

Background

Meningiomas are the most frequent primary brain tumours. Despite the high rate of relapse after surgical resection and radiotherapy no systemic treatment is indicated. Few data are available regarding the effectiveness of bevacizumab (BEV) in this setting. We performed a retrospective analysis investigating the efficacy and safety of BEV in meningioma patients relapsed after receiving surgery and radiotherapy. Gene mutations were also collected.

Methods

We analyzed pts treated with off-label BEV from Jul 2019 to Feb 2022. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of grade 2-3 meningioma, previous treatment with surgery and radiotherapy, no indication to further surgery or reirradiation, absence of contraindications to the use of BEV. Data were estrapolated from clinical records. BEV was administered until progressive disease, death, unacceptable toxicity. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the survival rate; CTCAE v 5.0 was used to estimate toxicities; RANO criteria were used for radiological assessment; Foundation One panel was used for molecular data.

Results

Median follow up was 13 months (3-30 range). 26 pts were enrolled. Median age was 68 ys (29-84); male pts were 16 (61%);61% (16 pts) with atypical meningioma, 38.5% (10 pts) with anaplastic meningioma; 27% (7 pts) underwent 2 or more surgeries; 58% had 2 or more RT treatments; 96.1% (25 pts) received <2 previous lines of systemic treatment. 77% (20 pts) and 23% (6) received BEV 10 and 5mg/Kg q2w, respectively. For 61% of patients (16 pts), NGS analyses were available; 62% (10 pts) had NF2 mutations (1 pt had a confirmed diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 2), 23% (6 pts) CDKN2A/2B deletion, 11% (3 pts) PTEN mutation, 8% (2 pts) FGFR mutation, 8% (2 pts) JAK alteration. OS rate was 82% and 62% at 6 and 12 months respectively; 6 months PFS rate was 83%. 4 pts showed PR, 11 SD, 6 PD, no pt had CR; 5 pts were not evaluable for response. The DCR was 71% and the ORR was 19%. Median PFS and OS were not reached. 19% (5 pts) experienced CTCAE grade 1 or 2 toxicity, mainly hypertension (4 pts).

Conclusions

BEV showed promising activity in recurrent meningioma. The treatment was well tolerated. BEV should be considered an optimal therapeutic option in this setting. The NGS results might be useful in identifying targetable mutations in case of further recurrence.

Clinical trial identification

BEMEN trial.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Veneto Institute of Oncology - IRCCS.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.