Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Proffered Paper session 2: GU tumours, non-prostate

LBA68 - Bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG) plus nivolumab (NIVO) compared to the investigator’s choice of sunitinib or cabozantinib in previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Results from a phase III randomized study (PIVOT-09)

Date

12 Sep 2022

Session

Proffered Paper session 2: GU tumours, non-prostate

Topics

Clinical Research;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Nizar Tannir

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S808-S869. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1089

Authors

N. Tannir1, M.N. Formiga2, N. Agarwal3, S.K. Pal4, D. Cho5, D.J. George6, W. Hong7, L. Tang7, A. Qureshi8, M.A. Tagliaferri9, J. Zalevsky10, K.D. Penkov11

Author affiliations

  • 1 Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 77030 - Houston/US
  • 2 Medical Oncology Department, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center - Centro Internacional de Pesquisa (CIPE), 01508-010 - Sao Paulo/BR
  • 3 Oncology/ Internal Medicine Dept., University of Utah Health - Huntsman Cancer Institute, 84112 - Salt Lake City/US
  • 4 Medical Oncology And Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 91010 - Duarte/US
  • 5 Medical Oncology Department, WMC Cancer Center, WV 26062 - Weirton/US
  • 6 Dept. Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, NC 27710 - Durham/US
  • 7 Clinical Development, Nektar Therapeutics, 94107 - San Francisco/US
  • 8 Global Clinical Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 08540 - Princeton/US
  • 9 Clinical Development Department, Nektar Therapeutics, 94158 - San Francisco/US
  • 10 Clinical Development, Nektar Therapeutics, 94158 - San Francisco/US
  • 11 General Department, Private Medical Institution "Euromedservice", 196603 - Saint-Petersburg/RU

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract LBA68

Background

Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) combinations improve clinical outcomes for patients (pts) with advanced RCC. BEMPEG is a pegylated IL-2 prodrug, designed with the intent to preferentially bind to IL-2Rβγ. PIVOT-09 is a Phase III, randomized trial of BEMPEG + NIVO vs VEGF-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of investigator’s choice for 1L RCC (NCT03729245).

Methods

Adult pts with measurable and untreated advanced/metastatic clear-cell RCC were randomized 1:1 (stratified by IMDC risk score and TKI choice) to receive BEMPEG IV 0.006 mg/kg + NIVO IV 360 mg q3w vs sunitinib 50 mg PO qd for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off, or cabozantinib 60 mg PO qd. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS) in pts with IMDC intermediate (I) or poor (P) risk, and in IMDC all-risk disease. The overall study α is 0.05 (2-sided), which is split with 0.001 for ORR and 0.049 for OS.

Results

623 pts (IMDC I/P n=514; IMDC favorable n=109) were randomized and 616 pts (IMDC I/P n=509; IMDC favorable n=107) received ≥1 dose of treatment (sunitinib n=221; cabozantinib n=85). Efficacy results for the IMDC I/P groups are reported. At a median duration of follow-up of 15.5 months, ORR was 23.0% for BEMPEG + NIVO vs 30.6% for the TKI arm. OS in IMDC I/P with p-value of 0.19 did not pass the pre-specified alpha of 0.01 at the interim analysis. mOS was 29.0 months for BEMPEG + NIVO and not reached for the TKI arm (HR=0.82, 99% CI: 0.56-1.21). In IMDC all-risk group, the most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, >20%) of any grade in BEMPEG + NIVO arm were pyrexia (32.6%), pruritus (31.3%), nausea (24.2%), eosinophilia (23.9%), hypothyroidism (22.9%), rash (22.9%), and arthralgia (20.0%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 83 pts (26.8%) and 24 pts (7.7%) discontinued due to TRAEs for BEMPEG or NIVO. Grade 5 TRAEs occurred in 3/310 pts (1.0%).

Conclusions

In pts with treatment-naïve advanced/metastatic clear-cell RCC, BEMPEG + NIVO did not improve outcomes vs investigator’s choice of TKI. The combination’s safety profile was consistent with previous reported findings.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03729245; Trial protocol: 17-214-09 / CA045-002 (October 19, 2021).

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by BOLDSCIENCE Inc. funded by Nektar Therapeutics.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.

Funding

This study is sponsored by Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, and Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.