Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 02

208P - Automated prognosis marker assessment in 2’004 breast cancers using an artificial intelligence-based framework for BLEACH&STAIN mfIHC

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 02

Topics

Clinical Research;  Pathology/Molecular Biology;  Molecular Oncology

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Tim Mandelkow

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S85-S87. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1039

Authors

T. Mandelkow, E. Bady, J.H. Müller, N.F. Debatin, M.C..J. Lurati, C. Hube-Magg, G. Sauter, N.C. Blessin

Author affiliations

  • Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 - Hamburg/DE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 208P

Background

Prognostic markers in routine clinical practice of breast cancer are currently assessed using multi-gene panels. However, the fluctuating tumor purity can reduce the predictive value of such tests. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) holds the potential for a better risk assessment.

Methods

To enable automated prognosis marker detection (i.e. HER2, GATA3, PR, ER, and AR, TOP2A, Ki-67, TROP2), we have developed and validated a framework for automated breast cancer identification, which comprises three different artificial intelligence analysis steps and an algorithm for cell-distance analysis of 11+1 marker BLEACH&STAIN multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) staining in 2′004 breast cancers.

Results

The optimal distance between Myosin+ basal cells and benign panCK+ cells was identified as 25 μm and used to exclude benign glands from the analysis combined with several deep learning-based algorithms. Our framework discriminated normal glands from malignant glands with an AUC of 0.96. The accuracy of the approach was also validated by well-characterized biological findings, such as the identification of 13% HER2+, 73% PR+/ER+, and 14 triple negative cases. Furthermore, the automated assessment of GATA3, PR, ER, TOP2A-LI, Ki-67-LI and TROP2 was significantly liked to the tumor grade (p<0.001 each). A high expression level of HER2, GATA3, PR, and ER was associated with a prolonged overall survival (p≥0.002 each).

Conclusions

A deep learning-based framework for automated breast cancer identification using BLEACH&STAIN mfIHC facilitates automated prognosis marker quantification in breast cancer.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

G. Sauter: Financial Interests, Personal, Other: MSVA Antibodies. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.