Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 07

328P - Association of skeletal muscle loss with patient-reported treatment toxicity among colon cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 07

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Radiological Imaging

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Karel Smit

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S136-S196. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1048

Authors

K. Smit1, J.W..G. Derksen1, W.B. Veldhuis2, P. Moeskops3, D.W. Sommeijer4, L. van Leeuwen-Snoeks5, M. Koopman6, A.M. May1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Julius Center, UMC - University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX - Utrecht/NL
  • 2 Radiology, UMC - University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA - Utrecht/NL
  • 3 R&d, Quantib, 3012 KM - Rotterdam/NL
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Flevo Hospital, 1315 RA - Almere/NL
  • 5 Medical Oncology, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 - Utrecht/NL
  • 6 Medical Oncology, UMC - University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA - Utrecht/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 328P

Background

Treatment toxicity is common among patients with colon cancer (CC) receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). In the metastatic setting, skeletal muscle mass (SMM) loss is related to increased toxicity, but data in the adjuvant setting is sparse. Therefore, we explored whether changes in SMM during ACT are associated with patient-reported treatment toxicity.

Methods

Data from the ongoing prospective PLCRC-PROTECT-Plus study were used. Patients completed an 8-item CTCAE (v3.0) based toxicity questionnaire after each ACT cycle. SMM was assessed with automatic analysis of CT scans at baseline (prior ACT), prior to the fourth cycle (during ACT) and 3 months after treatment. Based on a previously reported measurement error of 2%, SMM loss was defined as loss >2%. Occurrence of any grade ≥3 patient-reported toxicity was used as primary outcome. Poisson regression models adjusted for age and sex were applied.

Results

Currently, a total of 103 patients had a baseline and at least one follow-up CT scan (mean age 61 ± 9.8 years, 50% male). The ACT plan was 4 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin, except for 2 patients (8 cycles of capecitabine monotherapy). 56% of patients experienced >2% SMM loss from baseline to the fourth ACT cycle, and 22% lost >2% SMM from baseline to 3 months post-ACT. Overall, 30% of patients reported any grade ≥3 toxicity during ACT. Anorexia (15%), nausea (11%) and fatigue (9%) occurred most often. The risk of any grade ≥3 toxicity was significantly higher for patients with >2% SMM loss between baseline and after treatment (RR 2.37 95% CI 1.04-5.25), especially for fatigue (4.24, 1.06-18.1) and nausea (4.02, 1.12-16.3). No significant increased risk was found for SMM loss between baseline and prior to the fourth cycle of ACT (1.26, 0.58-2.87). Results will be updated for the 2022 ESMO conference.

Conclusions

This prospective study of CC patients shows that SMM loss from start to 3 months post-ACT was associated with an increased risk of any patient-reported grade ≥3 toxicities, whereas loss during ACT was not significantly associated. Future studies should elucidate whether SMM reduction is causally related to treatment toxicities.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

UMC Utrecht.

Funding

Province of Utrecht, SCOPE Collaboration.

Disclosure

P. Moeskops: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Employee at: Quantib. M. Koopman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, advisory board and speaker: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD, Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, Advisory Board, speaker: Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Merck, BMS, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Servier, Roche, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Personal Genomics Diagnostics, Sirtex, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Pierre Fabre, Amgen, Nordic Farma, Novartis, Merck, Servier, BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, vice-chair of DCCG: Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, Member of KWF scientific board: KWF; Non-Financial Interests, Other, ESMO faculty member for the Gastro-Intestinal Tumours – colorectal cancer: ESMO; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, expert member of committee “regie op registers dure geneesmiddelen” ZINNL: ZiNNL; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, CRC expert on Kanker.nl platform for answering online CRC questions of CRC (non) patients: Patient representative organisation (Kanker.nl); Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, chair of RWD & DH working group: ESMO; Other, Other, PI of the Dutch Prospective Colorectal Cancer Cohort study: PLCRC project. A.M. May: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: COMPASS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.