Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 15

1135P - Adverse event (AE) burden of nivolumab-based immuno-oncology (IO) therapy with/without chemotherapy (chemo) for first-line (1L) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 15

Topics

Cancer in Special Situations/ Populations

Tumour Site

Small Cell Lung Cancer;  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Lee Schwartzberg

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S448-S554. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1064

Authors

L.S. Schwartzberg1, A. Wu2, J. Hartman3, T. Wang4, X. Yin5, J. Chen4, K.A. Betts6, S.J. Lubinga3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Dept. Of Medical Oncology And Hematology, Renown Institute for Cancer, 89502 - Reno/US
  • 2 Analysis Group, Inc., 90071 - Los Angeles/US
  • 3 Health Economics Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, 08648 - Princeton/US
  • 4 Analysis Group, Inc., 02199 - Boston/US
  • 5 Real World Evidence, Bristol Myers Squibb, 08648 - Princeton/US
  • 6 Data Science & Statistical Modeling, Analysis Group, Inc., 90071 - Los Angeles/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1135P

Background

Nivolumab + ipilimumab (N + I) alone or with limited chemo (LC; up to 6 weeks [wks]) provide new 1L treatment (tx) options for aNSCLC; but the relative contributions of the different agents to the AE profile over time have not been assessed. Here, we quantified the AE rates and associated costs for N + I, N + I + LC, and N + chemo (C; 12+ wks) over time during tx for 1L aNSCLC.

Methods

Exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs) were calculated as the number of occurrences of all-cause grade 3–5 AEs per patient-year (PY), using individual patient data from the CheckMate 227 Parts 1 and 2 and CheckMate 9LA trials (minimum follow-up: 48, 38, and 23 months, respectively). EAERs were estimated for the overall trial period and at 5 pre-specified time periods (wks 0–6, 7–12, 13–24, 25–48, and 49+) to assess the impact of tx on AE burden. AE costs per patient were estimated as the rates of grade 3–5 AEs (with any-grade incidence ≥15%) multiplied by the corresponding unit hospitalization costs for AE management obtained from the 2019 US Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database.

Results

EAERs of all-cause grade 3–5 AEs per PY were lower with N + I (4.8) vs N + I + LC (7.0) and N + C (6.1) at wks 0–6 and lower with N + I (4.0) and N + I + LC (3.1) vs N + C (5.2) at wks 7–12, when chemo was administered; EAERs for the total exposure time period were similar in the N + I (2.6), N + I + LC (2.5), and N + C (2.5) tx groups (Table). EAERs continued to decline in subsequent wks in all 3 tx groups. Overall AE costs were lower with N + I ($6560) and N + I + LC ($7492) vs N + C ($11,731); similar trends were seen per time period. Table: 1135P

Time period, wks EAERa AE costb, $
N 3 mg/kg Q2W + I 1 mg/kg Q6W n = 576 N 360 mg Q3W + I 1 mg/kg Q6W + LC Q3W, up to 2 cycles n = 358 N 360 mg Q3W + C Q3W, 4+ cycles n = 547 N 3 mg/kg Q2W + I 1 mg/kg Q6W n = 576 N 360 mg Q3W + I 1 mg/kg Q6W + LC Q3W, up to 2 cycles n = 358 N 360 mg Q3W + C Q3W, 4 + cycles n = 547
0–6 4.8 7.0 6.1 2033 3155 3715
7–12 4.0 3.1 5.2 1650 1157 3328
13–24 2.5 2.2 2.7 944 1080 2374
25–48 1.7 1.7 1.2 1057 1423 1180
49+ 1.5 1.1 1.0 875 676 1134
Overall 2.6 2.5 2.5 6560 7492 11,731

aPer PY (defined as the total exposure time [time between date of first dose and the earliest among last dose date + 30 days, cutoff date, and date of death] for each patient at risk of AE); bPer patient. 1 cycle = 3 wks; Q2W, every 2 wks; Q3W, every 3 wks; Q6W, every 6 wks.

Conclusions

Higher incidence of AEs and AE costs associated with N + I + LC and N + C vs N + I correlated with the time when chemo was administered during tx; toxicities and costs declined over time after chemo was completed. Results imply an overall lower AE cost burden with 1L N + I compared with IO + chemo-based tx regimens for aNSCLC.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02477826 (CheckMate 227); NCT03215706 (CheckMate 9LA).

Editorial acknowledgement

Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Vidya Rajagopalan, PhD, of Envision Pharma Group funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; Analysis Group, Inc. provided the first draft as part of their role as authors.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Disclosure

L. Schwartzberg: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Napo, Spectrum, Seagen, Lilly, Pfizer, Coherus, AbbVie, Genentech, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Seagen, Pfizer, Coherus, Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Genentech; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: OneOncology; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: OneOncology. A. Wu: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Analysis Group, Inc.; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Institution received consulting fees for this work: Bristol Myers Squibb. J. Hartman: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. T. Wang: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Analysis Group, Inc.; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Institution received consulting fees for this work: Bristol Myers Squibb. X. Yin: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb. J. Chen: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Analysis Group, Inc.; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Institution received consulting fees for this work: Bristol Myers Squibb. K.A. Betts: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Analysis Group, Inc.; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Institution received consulting fees for this work: Bristol Myers Squibb. S.J. Lubinga: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.