Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 17

1297P - Adjuvant gemcitabine is as efficient as mFOLFIRINOX in patients with GemPred+ tumor signature and resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC): An ancillary study of the PRODIGE-24 clinical trial

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 17

Presenters

Remy Nicolle

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S592-S598. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1067

Authors

R. Nicolle1, J. Bachet2, A. Harlé3, J.L. Iovanna4, P. Hammel5, V. Rebours6, A. Turpin7, M. Ben Abdelghani8, A. wei9, E. Mitry10, A. Lopez11, J. Biagi12, E. Francois13, P. Artru14, A. Lambert15, D.J. Renouf16, M. Mauduit17, N. Dussetti18, T. Conroy19, J. Cros20

Author affiliations

  • 1 Centre De Recherche Sur L'inflammation (cri) U1149, Université Paris Cité, INSERM, CNRS ERL 8252, 75018 - Paris/FR
  • 2 Hépato - Gastro - Entérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpetriere, 75013 - Paris/FR
  • 3 Biotechnology Dept., Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin, 54519 - Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy/FR
  • 4 Centre De Recherche En Cancérologie De Marseille (crcm), Inserm U1068, Cnrs Umr, Aix-Marseille Université and Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France, 13288 - Marseille/FR
  • 5 Digestive And Medical Oncology Department, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux De Paris, 75012 - Paris/FR
  • 6 Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital APHP, 92110 - Clichy/FR
  • 7 Oncologie, CHU Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez, 59037 - Lille/FR
  • 8 Oncologie, Centre Paul Strauss Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer, 67065 - Strasbourg/FR
  • 9 Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, MSKCC - Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 10065 - New York/US
  • 10 Medical Oncology Dept., IPC - Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13273 - Marseille, Cedex /FR
  • 11 Gastroenterology And Hepatology, CHU Brabois, 54500 - Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy/FR
  • 12 Oncology Department, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, K7L 5P9 - Kingston/CA
  • 13 Oncology Department, Centre Anticancer Antoine Lacassagne, 06189 - Nice/FR
  • 14 Gi Oncology Department, Hôpital privé Jean Mermoz, 69373 - Lyon/FR
  • 15 Medical Oncology, Icl Alexis Vautrin, 54519 - Vandoeuvre Les Nancy/FR
  • 16 Medicine, BC Cancer Agency - Vancouver, V5Z 4E6 - Vancouver/CA
  • 17 R&d, Unicancer, 75654 - Paris/FR
  • 18 Pancreatic Cancer, CRCM centre de recherche en cancérologie de marseille, Marseille/FR
  • 19 Oncologie Médicale, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy/FR
  • 20 Pathology, Beaujon Hospital APHP, 92110 - Clichy/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1297P

Background

GemPred, a transcriptomic signature predictive of the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM), was developed from cell lines and organoids, and validated retrospectively (Nicolle et al). The phase 3 PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial has demonstrated the superiority of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) over GEM as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected PDAC at the expense of higher toxicity (Conroy et al). We evaluated the potential theranostic value of GemPred in this population.

Methods

Routine formalin fixed paraffin embedded surgical specimen of 350 patients were retrieved for RNA-sequencing and GemPred prediction (167 in Gem arm and 183 in mFFX arm). Survival analyses were stratified by resection margins, lymph-node status and CA19.9 level.

Results

Eighty-nine patients’ tumors (25.5%) were GemPred+ and therefore predicted a theoretical GEM-sensitivity. In the GEM arm, GemPred+ patients (n = 50, 30%) had a significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) than GemPred- patients (n = 117, 70%)(median 27 vs 10 months, HR=0.43; 95%CI [0.29-0.65] p<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median 68 vs 29 months, HR=0.42; 95%CI [0.27-0.66] p<0.001). GemPred had no predictive value in the mFFX arm. DFS and OS were similar in GemPred+ patients who received adjuvant GEM vs. those receiving mFFX (median 27 versus 24 months, and 68 versus 51 months, respectively). The statistical interaction between GEM and GemPred+ status was significant for DFS (HR=0.44; 95%CI [0.24-0.80]; p=0.008) and OS (HR 0.37; 95%CI [0.19-0.74] p=0.004).

Conclusions

The GemPred signature was positive in a quarter of patients and was associated with a similar survival in the gemcitabine adjuvant group compared to mFFX.

Clinical trial identification

EudraCT 2011-002026-52.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Unicancer.

Funding

Institut national du Cancer (INCa), Ligue nationale contre le cancer.

Disclosure

J.L. Iovanna: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: PredictingMed. N. Dussetti: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: PredictingMed. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.