Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 04

1292P - A review of in-hospital end-of-life care (EOLC) for oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 04

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management;  Fundamentals of Cancer Care Organisation;  Communication Skills;  Multi-Disciplinary and Multi-Professional Cancer Care;  End-of-Life Care;  COVID-19 and Cancer

Tumour Site

Presenters

Hailey Kathryn Carroll

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S581-S591. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1066

Authors

H.K. Carroll1, A. Broderick1, O. McCarthy2, M. Kennedy2, R. Bambury1, D.G. Power1, D.C. Collins1, R.M. Connolly1, S.A. Noonan1, D. Collins3, E. Cunningham2, K. O'Driscoll3, D. Nuzum4, K. Twomey3, A. O'Riordan3, F. O'Sullivan3, C. Roe3, M.J. O'Leary2, A.C. Lowney2, S. O'Reilly1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, CUH - Cork University Hospital, T12 DFK4 - Cork/IE
  • 2 Palliative Care, Marymount University Hospital & Hospice, T12 A710 - Cork/IE
  • 3 End Of Life Care Committee, CUH - Cork University Hospital, T12 DFK4 - Cork/IE
  • 4 Chaplaincy Department, CUH - Cork University Hospital, T12 DFK4 - Cork/IE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1292P

Background

Globally, 40 to 60% of all patient deaths occur in an acute hospital setting. Patients with cancer make up a significant proportion of those who die in hospitals. Clinicians involved in their care should be competent at recognising dying and documenting the quality of EOLC delivered to patients and families. Continued evaluation and audit of the care of the dying patient is essential for quality improvement at an organisational level.

Methods

The management of patients who died in Cork University Hospital under the Oncology Service’s care between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021 was analysed. Paper and electronic records were reviewed, and patient care was assessed using the Oxford Quality Indicators (QIs) for EOLC. Ethical approval was granted by the Cork University Hospital Quality and Patient Safety Department.

Results

66 patients were identified (M:F 29:37). The median age at time of death was 64 years [30-82]. The average length of admission resulting in death was 12.4 days [0-44]. 6% of patients died in the emergency department and 12% of patients died in the intensive care unit. The risk of dying was documented in 95.5% of cases and was communicated to 65.2% of patients and 82.8% of patients’ families. There was a do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) order in place for 89.4% of patients. Unnecessary investigations and interventions were stopped for 71.2% of patients. Symptom assessment was documented in 81.8% of cases. What was important to the patient was documented as explored in 24.2% of cases. 10.6% of patients were offered a chaplain or faith advisor. The inpatient palliative care team were involved in 77.2% of cases. Using the Oxford QIs for EOLC, the average quality score was 3.5, on a scale of 1-5: 1 (very poor): 0%, 2 (poor): 21.2%, 3 (satisfactory): 33.3%, 4 (good): 19.7%, 5 (excellent): 25.8%. The average EOLC quality score was 3.5.

Conclusions

Oncology patients at our centre received, on average, satisfactory-to-good quality EOLC. Shortcomings identified have led to the development of a care of the dying Pro-forma to improve EOLC delivery and a survey of bereaved relatives to identify gaps in care. Holistic care of the dying is a fundamental part of the cancer care spectrum and needs to be prioritised in the acute hospital setting.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

R. Bambury: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Honoraria and travel expenses: Pfizer, Jannsen, Bayer, Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Portable Medical Technology. R.M. Connolly: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: MSD Ireland, Pfizer, Daichii-Sankyo, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Education Grant: Pfizer. S. O'Reilly: Financial Interests, Personal, Travel expenses: Seagen, Novartis, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: HRB.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.