Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 10

673P - A prospective comparative study on biweekly docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (TPFL) versus triweekly TPF as an induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 10

Topics

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

Sreevalli Anantharamu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S295-S322. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1056

Authors

S. Anantharamu, L.A. Jacob, L. Dasappa, M.C. Suresh Babu, K..N. Lokesh, A.H. Rudresha, R. Lakkavalli Krishnappa, S.C. Saldanha

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, 560029 - Bangalore/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 673P

Background

Induction chemotherapy (ICT) is widely used in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). Triweekly TPF (Docetaxel/Cisplatin/5FU) is most commonly used regimen but is associated with significant neutropenia. Hence, we conducted a phase II randomised prospective study to see if biweekly TPF regimen was associated with equal response rates with lesser toxicities in our setting.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced SCCHN with primary site being oral cavity/oropharynx/hypopharynx/larynx -Stage III/IVA/IVB (AJCC 8) were enrolled into two arms- arm A (biweekly TPF) and arm B (triweekly TPF). Arm A received ICT with docetaxel 50mg/m2, cisplatin 50mg/m2, leucovorin 250 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 2500 mg/m2 (24hr continuous infusion) on day 1 biweekly for 3 cycles. Arm B received docetaxel 75mg/m2 and cisplatin 75mg/m2 on day 1, 5-FU 750mg/m2 (D1-D4 over 6hrs) triweekly for 2 cycles. Primary endpoint was response rate. Toxicity assessment was done as per NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.

Results

One hundred and twenty patients were enrolled from march 2020 to february 2021 with 60 in each arm. Overall response rate was 89.8% (CR=25.4% PR=64.4%) in biweekly and 73.37% (CR=6.7% PR=66.7%) in triweekly arm (p=0.2). Stable disease (SD) was seen in 5.1% vs 11.7%, progressive disease (PD) in 5.1% vs 15% in biweekly and triweekly arm respectively. Toxicities are as tabulated below. Treatment delay and inter-chemotherapy admissions were seen in 20.3% vs 46.7% (p=0.003) and 16.7% vs 33.3% (p=0.057) in biweekly and triweekly arm. There were two deaths in biweekly and four in triweekly arm. There was trend towards better PFS and OS in biweekly arm however survival data is yet to mature. Table: 673P

TOXICITIES Biweekly arm Triweekly arm p values
Grade 3/4 neutropenia 23.3% 41.7% p=0.05
Febrile neutropenia 10% 16.7% p=0.421
Infection rate 23.3% 41.7% p=0.23
Grade 3/4 mucositis 5% 23.3% p=0.007
Grade 3/4 diarrhoea 0% 10% p=0.027

Conclusions

Biweekly regimen had better response rates with lesser toxicities. Thus, biweekly TPF could be a feasible regimen in locally advanced SSCHN.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.