Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 15

1140P - A chemo-holiday immunotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 15

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Feng Li

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S448-S554. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1064

Authors

F. Li1, B. Wang1, Y. Xiang1, C.C. Li1, R. Zhong1, J. Li1, S. Xiong1, J. He2, W. Liang1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Thoracic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 510120 - Guangzhou/CN
  • 2 Thoracic Surgery And Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 510230 - Guangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1140P

Background

Immunochemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for NSCLC. However, there is no consensus on the optimal combination strategy and the maintenance regimen. We developed a regimen that aims to minimize the use of chemo without compromising efficacy and compared its effects to different first-line treatments.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 1,510 EGFR/ALK wild-type NSCLC patients who received immunochemotherapy in our center from 2019 to 2021. Patients who had controlled disease after 2-6 cycles of first-line immunotherapy (I) plus chemo (C) with or without anti-angiogenesis (A) were included. There are 4 common regimens: 4-6 cycles of initial induction followed by I+C+A maintenance (group 1, I+C+A), I+C maintenance (group 2, I+C), or I maintenance alone (group 3, I); chemo-holiday regimen: 2-4 cycles of immunochemotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis followed by I+A maintenance (group 4, I+A). For group 3-4, rechallenge with initial chemo-agents will be given upon the first progression, those achieving controlled disease can be repeatedly followed by another chemo-free period. The primary outcome was PFS. Notably, for group 3-4, PFS was defined as the time between treatment initiation and failure of rechallenge (last PD).

Results

A total of 140 eligible patients who entered the maintained phase were analyzed. There were 20, 40, 42 and 38 patients in group 1 to 4, with comparable baselines. The median PFS were similar between group 1 (22.6 months), 2 (21.0 months) and 4 (21.5 months), whereas PFS was relatively inferior in group 3 with immune alone (13.4 months). Median chemo-free duration in group 3 and 4 were 6.3 and 14.2 months. During the maintenance period of group 1 to 4, 25%, 25%, 19%, 42% of patients experienced PR again and 55%, 65%, 48% and 61% of patients maintained durable disease control beyond 6 months. In group 4, 50% of patients achieved PR and returned to chemo-free maintenance upon the first PD.

Conclusions

We designed a chemo-holiday regimen featured by short-term enhanced induction of antiangiogenic immunochemotherapy, maintenance by I+A, with on-demand chemo-rechallenge, and demonstrated its equivalence in PFS with less toxicity and cost. Additionally, anti-angiogenesis is crucial during chemo-free maintenance, compared to its role in chemo-on maintenance.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.